Tony Blair says we should seek a dialogue with Syria and Iran for help on Iraq.
These people stone women who were raped, hang gay teenagers, train terrorists, and seek nuclear weapons. I just heard on Glenn Beck just now that in Iran they are stoning to death a woman with an IQ of 60 for “luring” a forty-year-old man into bed.
These are not people we talk to; anyone who engages in these actions are people we kill and cheer when we hear they’re dead. Anything less and we’re not fit to call ourselves Americans.
Is any peace worth shaking the devil’s hand? And how long could such a peace last?
The only reason to shake hands with these people is to get close enough to strangle them.
So, I’m not going to stand in the way of yelling at people for stoning a woman, but how do we know she has an IQ of 60? And why does that really matter? I mean, we all know the woman barely has anything to do with herself getting raped. She’s just like the uncovered meat in the street – the flies will gather around no matter what the meat does. At least, that’s what the Imam says.
An IQ of 60 must be considered an intellectual challenge to these morons.
Guys, seriously, you’re missing the point: according to some lefty website, Iran “invested its oil wealth in universal education, healthcare, infrastructure bringing clean water and electricity to more than 98 percent of its people.” Even if that’s only half true and you use the MidEast definition of “clean water” (doesn’t have visible pieces of human fecal matter), a few [thousand] paltry human rights violations – murder and torture type, not the sham “hey, that cop can’t taser me just because I’m whacked out on PCP” type – can be overlooked. It’s just like the Soviet Union. It doesn’t matter that life sucked and everyone was brainwashed, every family got a loaf of bread every so often, and the government provided it for them! Besides, Bush can’t even begin to compare to Jimmy Achmenameanamajad — when was the last time G-W got up in from of an audience surrounded by an aura that caused everyone to give him full and undivided attention? NEVER!
While we should talk to our enemies (if only to distract them while we’re bombing their villas and nuclear plants), I get worried that some are thinking the conversation will go a little like this: “You guys can get Lebanon, but we get Iraq, okay? And you shouldn’t be the home base for Hamas, but we’ll look the other way with the Al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades. And you can’t have plutonium production, but the uranium enrichment is peachy keen!”
Oh wait. Carter, Clinton, and the North Koreans already tried the last of these. Now I see why we want to trust our national defense to the Democrats!
If by “seek a dialogue” he means “nuke”, I agree 100%
I know it’s wrong to stone a woman for having sex, but is it okay to have sex with a woman who is stoned?