Science! to Completely Replace Religion

There’s an atheist who thinks that Science! can answer moral questions. If you thought there was trouble from people enforcing their concepts of morality because of a religious certainty, just wait until people do it with scientific certainty. Someone could have a rounding error and think the most moral thing to do is strangle puppies in front of orphans.

Yes, I don’t think I’ll trust Science! with my morality; it’s already responsible for too many horrors in this world. Like clamshell packaging.

Hard Luck Stories

As part of passing the giant new health care bill, the Democrats were always telling these hard luck stories of how someone got cancer and couldn’t get treated so we had to pass their giant new bill that no one is sure what’s in. Just once, I’d like some Representative to say, “I knew this man, Robert, from my district. He kept hearing on TV all these Congressmen telling their asinine anecdotes of supposed real people as justification by useless nitwits for bloating the government and taking away freedoms, and he became so distraught by it he took a powerdrill to his head. That’s why you all have to stop telling your idiotic stories now. For people like Robert. Or I’ll punch you in the junk.”

An Alternative to the Supreme Court

I was thinking, wouldn’t a better idea than the Supreme Court be some sort of altar cursed with the angry spirits of the Founding Fathers? If they decided that something Congress did violated their ideals, then they’d attack Congress with their vengeance from beyond the grave, melting their faces. Like after this health care bill, the spirits would murder all in Congress who voted for it, and then we could be like, “Oh, I guess that wasn’t Constitutional; the Founding Fathers really didn’t like that.” Of course, with Rep. Henry Waxman we’d have all these false alarms thinking he had done something unconstitutional and they had started melting his face, but no, that’s just his normal face.

And was there really any use for the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution right when the American government was first made? Couldn’t then most of their work have been done by opening a window and shouting, “Hey, Madison, what did you mean by this?”

The End?

If you weren’t depressed enough, here’s an article by Mark Steyn on how the health care bill could be the beginning of the end for the U.S. Is he right? Who knows? America has always been a black swan; there’s nothing we can really compare it to, and everything we do is unique in its own way. Thus, it’s pretty hard to predict what will happen with us. Is Obamacare the ton of rocks that breaks the camel’s back, or is it going to severely harm us like the “Great Society” but we’ll continue to limp along as always?

So what do I predict? I’m going to be optimistic and guess this isn’t going to quite kill us just yet. But it’s going to be a load of fun when the bills come due.

What do you think?

Random Thoughts

What do I have to do to get “Commie Smasher” as an official title?

I love politicians just inflicting random rules on the private sector. Who knows what will happen? It’s wacky fun!

So there are people out there who honestly think this health care bill is the sort of thing the Founders would have liked? Like the Founders were about to add all these free goodies to the government, but there was a sale on powdered wigs and they forgot?

New Obama campaign: What freedoms would you give up for a Klondike Bar?

Obama will take his 20 pens and hide them across the world. The only way to undo the bill will be to find and unite them.

True fact: “This is a big @#$%ing deal” is what Stalin said to Lenin on the creation of the Soviet Union.

Big government is like a terminal disease. No cure, so we’ll just try to hang on as long as we can.

I like tax cuts mainly due to my racism, but I can’t speak for everyone.

Why are conservatives against universal health care? Because the only thing funnier than poor people is sick poor people.

So when do they start restricting speech under the Commerce Clause?

I’m guessing the “Hush Rush” type bills would be defended under that.

Fun part of evolving rights: Never know which new ones you’ll get and which old ones you’ll lose.

When lesbians attack

The ACLU is all excited about the little lesbian girl that wanted to go to the prom (tip: Hot Air).

It’s some bogus logic that some Mississippi court came up with that says the school was wrong. The ruling said the cancellation was a problem because it had the effect of “prohibiting Constance McMillen from bringing her girlfriend as a date and wearing a tuxedo to the event.”

Another instance where “free speech” doesn’t involve speech. And, to me, that’s the problem.

So, what’s the school to do now?

I suggest a compromise: Change the school nickname from “The Indians” to “The Fighting Lesbians”

Everybody wins!