2 Comments

  1. The proposal was couched in typical government weasel-words.

    They wouldn’t study whether there was actually bias or not; they’d only have to report on whether it was perceived or not.

    And they don’t even specify who does the perceiving. It could be themselves.

    [Much like government programs to “raise awareness” of something.. By whom, and to what pre-determined level? Doesn’t the mere act of writing the proposal raise awareness by itself? And is awareness a goal in itself, or is some second step contemplated?]

    Thus, social science is not a science at all. Q.E.D.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.