The New War?

Apparently the Wikipedia entry for IMAO was deleted as it can’t be found (nor the deletion discussion). Interestingly enough, puppy blender hasn’t gained controversy.
Now, I don’t want anyone trying to add an IMAO entry to Wikipedia; they had their chance, and they voted for their own destruction. Yes, I didn’t really care much about the Wikipedia until I heard some bloggers talking about it a couple weeks ago, and now I’ve decided to destroy it. Random vandalism is stupid and childless and easily dealt with; the destruction of Wikipedia will have to be more devious. First, I’ll have to understand the inner workings of the Wikipedia and then…
Man, this is already starting to sound complicated. Someone else want to nefariously plot how to destroy Wikipedia?

No Comments

  1. Sadly, anything you do on Wikipedia, no matter how extreme, can be easily undone by simply going to the page history and reverting to an earlier one. Oh, and the Puppy Blender article has been marked for merging and redirecting with the Instapundit page.

  2. There’s only one solution to a mission of this magnitude:
    We spread rumours that Wikipedia is made primarily of bananas and criticizes the martial arts. Then sit back and watch as it is overrun by hordes of angry monkeys and ninjas.
    If this doesn’t work, we can taunt them by quoting MOnty Python.
    MUHAHAHAHAHA!

  3. Is there a Wikipedia entry for DemocraticUnderground? If not, make one that sends the moonbats into fits like they had on election night. Wikipedia will be over-run by moonbats, discredited, and fade into oblivion.

    • Antsa… you must have lesydicx then…
    • Beo…. the answer to the Santa/Satan thing is !ON ……
    • I don’t have time for the Wikipedia campaign….It came to light today that Rather talks to Morrows ghost….This is much more in need of immediate nuking…..
  4. I suggest using S.M.I.T.E. or another space-based weapons platform. An orbital Jello laser would be a cool way to do it. Besides, remember how in all those Bond movies how the villain tries to make diamond lasers? If you use jello, which is not valuable, nobody would notice the laser’s construction. Nobody would know until the Wikipedia was a smoking, laser riddled, hulk!

  5. I checked it out and found they had posted a notice “candidate for speedy deletion because: repost” ..
    they also state that disagreements could be posted on “its talk page” (which is not available yet)
    Following the link for a definition of speedy deletion and the repost violation I found the statement that only an administrator can remove a page No definition is available for explaining a “repost” in your case. However, the same six comments made on your site were reposted 500 times. Sounds like someone knew how to use the rules to sabotage you.

  6. Have Al Franken promote it as the left’s answer to the right’s dictionaries.
    Have Jimmy Carter administer it.
    Bork it.
    Schedule its makers for blind dates with Ted Kennedy.
    Have John Kerry try to explain it.
    Make it part of the Public Education system.

  7. The whole Ass to Mouth thing gives me an idea: come up with a bunch of unusual sexual acts that no normal person would find sexual and give them descriptive names. Post articles about each one. In no time Wikipedia will fade into obscurity as just another porn site on the internet.
    On a related note, J. Harrell, how did you come across A2M to begin with?

  8. Does “nefariously plot” mean “throwing doggie pooh at them”?
    I’m pretty good at that. Just ask my neighbors.
    …err, on second thought, don’t. I wasn’t there that night. Yeah, that’s the ticket. Yeah.

  9. Wikipedia is run by a demonic cult. The symbols on their puzzle logo command satan worship. The “Wiki” preface is a from of “wicked” Meaning they promote adding evil entries to their encyclopedia. Especially evil immoral entries describing impure sexual acts. Some of this cults members worship sex demons. The global puzzle logo also symbolizes their plan to take over the world one person at a time through the dark arts. Then they will create a New World Order in which the UN has ultimate power over all. It is written in their secret online book.

  10. problem….Wikipedia is already overrun by moonbats. They actually have an article about the paranoid freaky left-wing 9/11 conspiracy theories, which I posted a scathing response to in the comments section (note that I meant 17 decades of lies, not 27).
    Wikipedia is not worth the time, Frank. It was useful for a few things but all in all I’d rather just use Encarta. You want to destroy Wikipedia? They’re destroying themselves. They’re rapidly becoming their own worst enemy, learning the art of accidental self-parody even more quickly than Dan Rather did. You’ve got nothing to worry about, Frank. IMAO will probably still be around long after Wikipedia is dead, deleted, and gone.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.