Dueling Headlines

New York Times: “Homeownership Losses Are Greatest Among Minorities, Report Finds”

Wall Street Journal: “Housing Boom Aided Minorities”

Yes, they’re both talking about the same report.

12 Comments

  1. Perhaps they would not be affected so much, if they would:

    1. be in the country legally.
    2. hold a job for more than a month.
    3. quit doing drugs.
    4. quit commiting crimes.
    5. have less children so they can live within their means.

  2. It was only fair to lend minorities money they couldnt pay back, so they can experience briefly the utter happiness and joy that us hard working non minorities experience on a daily basis. Thank you Bill Clinton! The responsibility of making house payments that are due on a monthly basis can just be too much when you dont hold a job, your mortgage payment that you signed up to pay has jumped up 20% in interest alone. What is more cruel? Giving somebody something they could never keep in the first place, or making them WORK FOR IT AND KEEP IT!!!!!!!!!! Then again, when they tell you payment increases are a possibility and you still take the bait….theres your sign. I wouldnt bite on that one, and I bet 99.9% of conservatives wouldnt. Liberals think in the short term of “I can own my own house now”, not thinking as a conservative would – “In 3-5 years my mortgage will jump up in payments due to rising interest rates that will only be counted as interest alone towards my balance , therefore not gaining any equity in my investment from this payment increase, and simply handing my money to the mortgage company for them to have and use for bonuses or corporate retreats to spas ect. Theres a good possibility I wouldnt be able to afford an increase in payment that large and would lose my home, and ruin any credit I may have! Id better get a fixed rate loan and save up my money for a better house in the future.” That is classic Conservative vs liberal thought right there.

  3. I can hardly wait for someone to explain the different headlines with, “It’s because the Wall Street Journal is a far-right rag.” I’m way behind on my hippie-punching.

  4. Speaking of two sides of a story, the truth and then the lib-speak. This article on Slate about Obamuh is unbelievable. They must have decided that if you can’t find anything good to say about him, then here are 4 things we made up. It would by funny if it weren’t so annoying when the soft brains of the hippies ooze out onto your shoes. http://www.slate.com/id/2218357/?GT1=38001

  5. Yeah, and minorities were FOR housing booms before they were AGAINST them right up until minority interest rates dropped unless they couldn’t get them until they knew who to call to get an Obama mortgage deal, unless they weren’t underwater before they applied, in which case they were AGAINST the whole thing and really pissed-off, the babies, but they still LOVE Obama anyway, because they’re idiots.

  6. They are both right. The fascist Democrats forced fanny and freddie to uderwrite loans to deadbeat minorites who bought property willy, nilly. Then the deadbeats can’t pay their mortages and their properties are being repossesed. The banks don’t take the losses. So the fascists make the American taxpayer pay for the deadbeat loses. And Obama continues to loot the treasurey.

    Please notice how negroes and white liberals could care less about the treasurey being looted.

  7. What is it with the liberals and looting?

    My city’s underwater! (looting).
    Power outage! (looting).
    Earthquake! (looting).
    I disagree with that verdict! (looting).
    My team won! (looting).
    My team lost! (looting).
    My party controls the legislature, the executive, the judiciary and the press!
    (bring in the dump-trucks – alert the freighter!)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.