Reelecting Obama Would Be a Mockery of Democracy

So US poverty is on track to be at its highest level since the 1960s. With that little tidbit and all the other things — the credit downgrade, the continued high unemployment, the skyrocketing debt — makes we really wonder why in the world are we even considering reelecting Obama at all? I mean, he’s as big an objective failure as president as possible, so why is he even a contender? The whole point of a democracy is being able to remove bad leaders, so why should Obama have a chance when he’s the sort of horrible leader usually only dictatorships are subjected to (and even there, he probably wouldn’t last long)? When the story of the 2012 election is written in the history books, it should be just one sentence:

Obama wasn’t reelected as he wasn’t a very good president.

Why shouldn’t it be that simple? Otherwise, what’s the point of electing leaders?

13 Comments

  1. Obama wasn’t reelected as he wasn’t a very good president and the margin of victory was so large that even Democrats couldn’t cheat brazenly enough to affect the outcome.

    History…2d draft.

  2. Re“electing” Obama Would Be was a Mockery of Democracy.

    If there were enough deadbeat welfare leeches and brain dead liberals to “elect” him in the first place, just imagine 10 years from now…..
    There needs to be a constitutional amendment: if you’re between 18 and 64 and getting ANY form of government handout, you can’t vote, period.

  3. Has anyone thought about what Obama might do when he finds out he lost big to Romney?
    After all, he will still be president for another two months and in control of all those drones.
    Just sayin’…

  4. Half the voters think he’s the best President ever!
    Half the voters think he’s the worst President ever!
    All of the voters are extremists!

    If he wins – we will all lose!
    If he looses – ?

  5. “Obama wasn’t reelected as he wasn’t a very good president.”
    Frank, aren’t you contradicting yourself? You yourself wrote “Obama the Greatest President in the History of Everything”. I even bought a Kindle copy of it. Obama, in an unusually modest moment averred he was the “4th greatest President”. I don’t know if this was before he decided he was the Messiah or God. But, how could he be a not very good President?
    (Do I really need to add the /sarc ?)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.