Promoted Comment: Jimmy’s Objectionable Phrases

Courtesy of Jimmy:

Check the sentences you don’t like:

◯ “My wife and I just love the calf’s sweet meats.”
◯ “We eat all of it: heart, liver, kidneys, tongue, oxtails, eyeballs.”
◯ “My wife’s lamb kidneys, rice and gravy are my favorite.”
◯ “Cut-off the fish’s head just aft of the facial parts where the meat starts.”
◯ “Remove the fish’s innards by pulling the esophagus toward the anus.”
◯ “The remaining guts have to be removed with your fingers.”
◯ “You gotta cook those giblets a little extra before you chop ’em up, especially the gizzard.”
◯ “Charlie’s liver was steaming in the morning air. Momma took it inside and fried it up for lunch!”

I Find This Weirdly Interesting

I also saw some article that claimed humans are the only animals with noses. Odd.

I’ll say at the outset, I don’t like the phrase “human scalp hair.” Too Indian.

Why do Humans Have Long Scalp Hair?
The Scientist | January 22, 2025 | Sahana Sitaraman, PhD

Humans are the only mammals with long hair on their heads. Scientists look into what drives this unique feature.

Humans evolved long hair on their head to prevent overheating and excess water loss when walking under the hot sun in Africa.

In 2004, a Chinese woman named Xie Qiuping won the Guinness World Record for the longest human scalp hair at 5.627 meters—the length of an adult male giraffe! While this is an anomaly, humans are the only mammals that have negligible body hair, but extremely long hair on their heads. “It’s such an important part of our identity as a species and yet, we understand so little about it,” said Maksim Plikus, a developmental biologist at University of California, Irvine, who studies the regeneration of hair.

Maksim Plikus? My new Witness Protection name?

One theory dates back to life millions of years ago, when human ancestors roamed across Africa, exposed to the blazing sun. As they spent a lot of time outdoors searching for food and water, they needed efficient mechanisms to keep their body cool. “In human evolution access to fresh water was always something that individuals and groups had to think about and plan over,” Jablonski said. “So having a thermoregulatory mechanism that would help to conserve precious water would be advantageous.” The absence of fur and abundance of sweat glands helped keep the body cool even after bouts of exercise, such as hunting animals.

Makes sense. Thanks, God.

However, the head received the most solar radiation and probably needed other ways to keep it from overheating. Prehistoric cave paintings from Europe and Australia and Egyptian mummies with preserved hair suggest that long hair was a universal feature across different populations of humans.

Tightly curled and long scalp hair of ancient hominins …

Dislike that word. To me, it will always be “hominids.”

… could have evolved to shield the scalp from the sun, reduce heat transmission due to the air pockets between the curls and minimize water loss through sweat. While it is not known when curly hair emerged, it is likely that long hair growth evolved later to compensate for curly hair’s tendency for wear and tear.

{Yeah, but then — why would a Bushman of the Kalihari have short, curly hair, but a Swede have long flowing locks? Heat?}

Hair length depends on the hair growth cycle. A hair follicle can either be in the active growth phase called anagen or the rest phase called catagen. Stimulatory signals trigger the proliferation of matrix cells in the hair follicle during anagen, lengthening the hair strand. A continuous supply of these cells is essential for the sustained growth of hair. A typical human scalp hair follicle stays in anagen for five to seven years, producing hair that is 50–110 centimeters (19–43 inches) long.

BS. (?) Human hair grows after age 7. Ask Farrah Fawcett.

For exceptionally long hair, such as that of Qiuping, the matrix cells would have to undergo over 11,000 divisions over more than 30 years!

And then it stops? Why am I still going to a barber?

“Hair follicle is like a biological 3D printer. Based on the molecular program you feed it, it’ll print something tiny or something super long,” said Plikus.

Plikus again. I’m beginning to like him.

“You don’t need to add any new components. You just have to instruct the various cells to work for longer and print for longer.”

Though no other mammal can boast of the exceptional hair lengths seen on human heads, the potential for long hair growth is conserved across the class, from the wispy “mustaches” of emperor tamarin monkeys to the meter-long body hair skirt of extinct Woolly mammoths.

Boring.

Studies on human dermatological conditions that alter hair length could provide insights on the molecular basis and genetic regulators of long scalp hair in humans. Mutations in fibroblast growth factor 5 (FGF5), a protein that promotes catagen entry, cause familial trichomegaly, a condition where body hair and eyelashes grow unnaturally long.7 Since the mutations prolong anagen throughout the body, it is likely that the gene is differentially controlled through modifications in its regulators in the scalp cells. Contrastingly, variants of the protein Wnt Family Member 10A shorten anagen, possibly causing conditions like androgenetic alopecia, or male pattern baldness.

Mega-boring. Didn’t read.

Scientists have started to dig deeper in the enigma of human scalp hair. Comparative studies of body and head hair using RNA sequencing and next-generation spatial sequencing, transplantation of human hair to rodent models, constructing computational models of hair growth and examining the intricacies of hair growth in individuals could unravel the molecular drivers of human hair growth. A clearer picture of how human scalp hair reaches considerable lengths could then lead to new therapeutic leads for conditions like hair loss or genetically stunted hair. “How could you treat a disease of short hair if you didn’t even know what’s the normal recipe for long hair?” Plikus pointed out.

Don’t like the phrase “human scalp hair”, and how Plikus considers short hair to be a disease.

F ’em. I’ve got my hair.

Sometimes Legal Mumbo-Jumbo Is Interesting. Even Relevant.

Next Up: Humphrey’s Executor
Manhattan Contrarian | 31 Jan. 2025 | Francis Menton

Humphrey’s Executor is the key Supreme Court case addressing the following question: Can the President fire anybody and everybody in the federal bureaucracy whom he wants to fire, effective immediately, no questions asked? This is a rather important question. During his first term, Trump faced constant resistance to his policies from the people who supposedly worked for him. Indeed, they rallied under a hashtag #Resistance, like it was a badge of honor. Meanwhile, the Constitution (Article II, Section 1) states in seemingly unambiguous terms that “The Executive Power” is “vested” in the “President.” So can’t the President just fire people who won’t do his bidding? After all, he was elected, and they weren’t, and the voters should be entitled to get the policies they voted for. Shouldn’t they?

But of course, over the years, there have grown up all kinds of statutory restrictions on the ability of the President to fire people. Some of these restrictions apply to lower-level employees (the “civil service”), and others to relatively high-level people like Commissioners of “independent” agencies, Inspectors General, and so forth. Given that the Constitution vests all of the “Executive Power” in the President, aren’t such restrictions on his power unconstitutional?

This is where Humphrey’s Executor comes into the mix. The facts of the case arose in 1933 — early in Franklin Roosevelt’s first term as President — and the case was decided by the Supreme Court in 1935. Humphrey was a Commissioner of the FTC, appointed by prior President Herbert Hoover to a seven-year term, that would then continue throughout Roosevelt’s first administration. Roosevelt wanted to get rid of Humphrey, but the FTC statute at the time provided (as it still provides today) that Commissioners could only be removed for “inefficiency, neglect off duty, or malfeasance in office.” So Roosevelt just ignored the statutory restriction and fired the guy. Humphrey sued. (He died while the case was pending, and the case for his pay was then continued by his executor, which is why the case goes by the name of Humphrey’s Executor.)

The Supreme Court held, in one of its most bizarre opinions ever, that Humphrey was improperly fired and that his estate was entitled to its back pay. I wrote a post about this bizarre case back in December 2016. The Court’s logic turns on the idea that the power of an FTC Commissioner is not “executive” in nature, even though the Commissioners have the authority to execute and enforce the laws. The opinion makes no sense whatsoever. However, it has never been overruled, and stands today as Supreme Court precedent. I’ll be surprised if even the crazy liberals on today’s Supreme Court are ready to uphold this case.

Cue Up Souza’s “The Stars and Stripes Forever”

Army recruiting shatters records after President Trump election win
Fox News | February 4, 2025 | Alexandra Koch

The U.S. Army recently announced it shattered previous recruiting records, with December 2024 being the most productive December in 15 years.

The branch reported it enlisted nearly 350 soldiers every day that month, Army officials announced Tuesday on social media.

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth took to X to share the news.

“BOTTOM LINE: America’s youth want to serve under the bold & strong “America First” leadership of [President Donald Trump] @realDonaldTrump.”

Bond Girlathon Results of 1/29/2025 : New Matches for 2/5/2025

We keep on keeping on like we’re James Bond in an Austin Martin.

Week 1/29/2025 Results

Monica BellucciNo PreferenceTonia Sotiropoulou
120696
Ana de ArmasNo PreferenceLea Seydoux
137279

Week 2/5/2025

Match 1

Diana Rigg (Teresa di Vicenzo) vs Cassandra Harris (Countess Lisl von Schlaf)

ContestantRecordTotal Scores
Diana Rigg2 – 0 – 0545 – 0 – 53
Teresa di Vicenzo

Actress:Diana Rigg
Nationality:English
Bond Movie:On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (1969)

Synopsis:

Contessa Teresa di Vicenzo was the most important girl in Bond’s life, becoming Mrs Tracy Bond by the end of the film. Starting out troubled and suicidal, Tracy was rescued by Bond, who gradually fell in love with her. At their wedding, Bond vowed that they would have all the time in the world together. In a tragic twist of irony, Tracy was assassinated by Ernst Stavro Blofeld as the pair were stopped at a roadside to remove the flowers from their car.

Diana Rigg

VS

ContestantRecordTotal Scores
Cassandra Harris0 – 2 – 086 – 6 – 279
Countess Lisl von Schlaf

Actress:Cassandra Harris
Nationality:Australian
Bond Movie:For Your Eyes Only (1981)

Synopsis:

Countess Lisl von Schlaf was the mistress of Milos Columbo, a Greek smuggler. Columbo asked Lisl to stage an argument with him at dinner, as an excuse for her to go off with Bond, to discover some information about him. Lisl and Bond spent the night together, and got on quite well. They went for a walk on the beach the next morning, and Lisl was tragically killed by henchman Locque.

Cassandra Harris

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Who do you prefer?
57 votes · 57 answers

Match 2

Angela Scoular (Ruby Bartlett) vs Kristina Wayborn (Magda)

ContestantRecordTotal Scores
Angerla Scoular0 – 2 – 030 – 1 – 561
Ruby Bartlett

Angela Scoular
Nationality:English
Bond Movie:On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (1969)

Synopsis:

Ruby Bartlett was one of the “angels of death” at Blofeld’s swiss clinic. She had been brought there to cure a chicken allergy, but was in fact being hypnotized by Blofeld as part of a plot to spread a crop virus around the country. When she first met Bond, disguised as Sir Hillary Bray, she discreetly wrote her room number in lipstick on his thigh, so that he could meet her later that night.

Angela Scoular

VS

ContestantRecordTotal Scores
Kristina Wayborn1 – 1 – 0174 – 2 – 229
Magda

Actress:Kristina Wayborn
Nationality:Swedish
Bond Movie:Octopussy (1983)

Synopsis:

Magda was the right-hand woman of Octopussy, and assisted her smuggling partner Kamal Khan on many occasions throughout the film. After attending an auction in which Bond stole a Fabegé egg, Magda was sent to sleep with Bond so that she could steal it back. After Octopussy found out that Khan tried to kill her, her cult of girls, Magda included, storm Khan’s palace.

Kristina Wayborn

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Who do you prefer?
56 votes · 56 answers