Straight Line of the Day: Other Things That Need Massive Funding To Study: ..

Agriculture Dept. gave university $600K to study ‘menstrual cycles in trans men’
The College Fix | March 06, 2025 | David Glasser – Florida State University

Conservative group uncovers 341 federal grants totaling $128 million for gender ideology research

The U.S. Department of Agriculture granted Southern University Agricultural & Mechanical College in Louisiana $600,000 to study menstrual cycles in “transgender men,” according to a new database compiled by the American Principles Project.

The database, “Funding Insanity: Federal Spending on Gender Ideology under Biden-Harris,” states the school “will Study Menstrual Cycles in ‘Transgender Men And People With Masculine Gender Identities, Intersex, And Non-Binary Persons.’”

“The first occurrence of menstruation occurs at approximately 12 years of age and ends with menopause at roughly 51 years of age,” the grant description states. “A woman will have a monthly menstrual cycle for about 40 years of her life, averaging to about 450 periods over the course of her lifetime.”

“It is also important to recognize that transgender men and people with masculine gender identities, intersex and non-binary persons may also menstruate,” it states. “At any given moment about 26% of the world’s population is menstruating.”

Aaauughh!

Science Thoughts

Can’t old bald dudes have hair transplanted from their ears and noses to their head? If not, why not?

What about their armpits? They always seem to have plenty of hair there. Pubes. But who wants pubes on their head? Ecch.

Fortunately, Oppo does not suffer from this particular loss-of-head-hair malady, so he’ll never have pubes put on his head.

That’s all for Science Thoughts today.

Solution: One Emu

Massachusetts woman buys house, court orders her to allow a squatter to live in it
Not The Bee | March 07, 2025

…

The nightmare started last fall when [Meghan] McIntyre and her boyfriend decided to move back to Plymouth and purchase their own home. Months later, instead of moving into the house they bought, they are forced to rent an apartment while also paying the mortgage on a home they aren’t allowed to live in. Instead, someone else is living in the house.

Finding out someone else is living in the house you just bought:

“It’s like a never-ending nightmare,” McIntyre said of her attempt to move back home to Plymouth.

It turns out that Ms. McIntyre purchased a foreclosed property. She was under the impression

She did not visit the house??????

that it was vacant and move-in ready. But shortly before moving in, they got a call from a former occupant of the house — someone who was “never an owner,” “never a tenant” and “never paid rent,” yet who had lived there to care for her mother and who wanted to move back in after her mother’s death.

Since when is “wanted to” a valid legal claim? I’d own a lot of things, if that were true.

Rather understandably, Meghan said no. And that’s where the nightmare really began:

‘The next day we got a call from the housing court that we had a court date,’ she said.

The judge ruled that McIntyre had to give the woman the keys and allow her to stay at the house.

!

Real estate attorney Jordana Greenman said the scenario is “horrifying,” but she said state law explicitly allows for someone’s home to essentially be seized and used in this way:

‘It is another one of those things that in Massachusetts with all of the consumer protection rules, nobody can be unhoused per se, without a court order,’ Greenman explained. ‘It might boil down to how much are they willing to pay to get this person out. And then they’ll go, which is really very upsetting. It should not be so difficult.’

…

A court has ordered McIntyre to “pay for a whole list of expenses” prior to starting eviction:

McIntyre said they had to pay to restore the floors after they ripped up the carpet to replace them. McIntyre is paying the utility bills and even had to put the woman up in a hotel and pay for her meals when the heat stopped working in the home.

McIntyre said this is on top of her paying for the mortgage, HOA fees and rent. She estimated they are paying around $10,000 a month just in housing.

Thankfully, there’s some end in sight. The rightful homeowner and her squatter tenant reached an agreement:

Under the deal, the woman gets to stay until the end of March and McIntyre has to pay her $7,500 to put towards a new apartment.

I have to stop commenting here, since this is a PG site. Bring on the Emu.

Straight Line of the Day: Co-Existing in a World Full of Wooly Mice and Wooly Mammoths …

Hoping to revive mammoths, scientists create ‘woolly mice’
NPR | March 04, 2025 | Rob Stein

Scientists have genetically engineered mice with some key characteristics of an extinct animal that was far larger — the woolly mammoth.

This “woolly mouse” marks an important step toward achieving the researchers’ ultimate goal — bringing a woolly mammoth-like creature back from extinction, they say.

… Scientists implanted genetically modified embryos in female lab mice that gave birth to the first of the woolly pups in October.

Straight Line of the Day: Men and Women Are Wrong About What the Opposite Sex Finds Hot. For Instance: …

Men and women are wrong about what the opposite sex finds hot, new study reveals
New York Post | Feb. 28, 2025 | Adriana Diaz

A new study published in PLOS One found that men and women misjudge what the opposite sex finds attractive. A research team in the United Kingdom asked 144 people — with an average age of 22 — to adjust a 3D model of a man’s or a woman’s face to match their appearance to find out what they believed the other gender finds the most attractive for both short- and long-term relationships.

Sharp, bold features like chiseled jawlines are often described as more masculine, while soft, delicate features like full lips are characterized as more feminine …

“We have demonstrated a substantial misperception of what men and women predict the opposite sex to desire in terms of sexual dimorphism of face shape,” the study authors concluded.

144 participants? This study was gross.

Straight Line of the Day: A Norwegian Company Cut Off Fuel To U.S. Forces. In Retaliation, the U.S. …

Norwegian fuel supplier refuses U.S. warships over Ukraine
UK Defence Journal | 1 Mar 2025 | George Allison

Norwegian fuel company Haltbakk Bunkers has announced it will cease supplying fuel to U.S. military forces in Norway and American ships docking in Norwegian ports, citing dissatisfaction with recent U.S. policy towards Ukraine.

.

But the celebration didn’t last long. After immediate backlash and embarrassment, Haltbakk Bunkers quietly deleted their statement. The Norwegian government had no choice but to intervene. Defense Minister Tore O. Sandvik issued an official statement reaffirming that the Norwegian government does not support Haltbakk Bunkers’ reckless decision and that the U.S. military will continue to receive all necessary support in Norway.

— Gateway Pundit