Archive for October, 2009
New extra special Crowder Halloween video:
Friend of IMAO Michael Z. Williamson has made a new t-shirt:
Is torture funny, though? Now lots of people don’t like torture, but I don’t see why I should have a problem with it if it’s not done to someone I like, like myself. I don’t really mind if terrorists get tortured, because I don’t like them. Also, I don’t mind if animals get tortured because they are my inferiors and would torture me if given half the chance. No, I guess that’s not true; they would have to be given the full chance to be able to torture me. This is why I don’t like animals; all they want to do is torture me. Sick bastards.
It would be weird enough as a duck-like, egg-laying mammal, but did you know the male platypus has a poisonous spur? That’s right, it’s also part scorpion. But that’s not even the weirdest part. It can use its bill to detect electrical signals. You get that? It’s a badger duck scorpion with built in radar. As is, it’s already qualified to enter Xavier’s School for Gifted Youngsters, but further analysis of its genome shows it actually has genes previously thought to only exist in birds, amphibians, and fish. And it has ten sex chromosomes; Science! hasn’t even determined how it keeps things straight.
There are many evolutionary theories on the platypus, but the most popular are that it was made in a lab by a mad scientist or it crashed landed in some sort of spaceship. Science! will continue to keep a sharp eye on it, though, because if it evolves high-intelligence, it would probably be the doom of the human race… and one would just assume by that point it would also have developed the ability to shoot laser blasts from its eyes.
Should we as a society wear more sashes?
Sashes help denote rank and keep order. Everyone knows the person with the mayor sash is the mayor and the person with a mechanic sash is a car mechanic. But does this lead to elitism? Wasn’t it the dream of the Founding Fathers that we become a sashless society? And how does one limit themselves to one sash? Do I wear my blogger sash, my engineer sash, or the world’s greatest grandpa sash that I stole from someone?
Complicated questions without easy answers. What say you?
You’d think a unicorn typing C code with its horn would create great code, but it doesn’t even indent consistently.
What would have been a great line during the debate for Hoffman to say to Scozzafava: “You’re still here?”
To balance things out, I’m going to make candle-scented cinnamon.
Caleb Howe has an article, in light of recent work to get back to the moon, asking what’s happened to all the things Science! has promised us, like jetpacks and robots. Well, Science! is a fickle master that is easily insulted. Each day someone disputes evolution is another day Science! denies us jetpacks and laser rifles. We must give unquestioning loyalty to all the tenets of Science! or it may even punish us with something scientific like an asteroid or a supernova. Or maybe even just a regular nova. Science! also doesn’t like the Harry Potter or Twilight series as they are quite unscientific. Lay those books at its altar (a lab table) and burn them, and Science! may grant you knowledge.
You can have a robot friend and fly around with him in your jetpack, but only if you convince Science! that you are worthy.
Who is Gore Vidal? All I know about him is he’s some weird degenerate who is trotted out every so often so we can admire what a weird degenerate he is.
And when are liberals going to look into their pro-rapist problem?
What’s up with this?
So an artist come by and says, “Hey, man, I want to paint circles on your houses to make them look 2D!”
And I’d say, “For what possible purpose?”
And the artist would say, “It’s art, man. Art is its own purpose.”
And I’d say, “Here’s some art.” Then I’d punch him in the face. “Now your face looks like a cubist painting. Get a real job, hippie.”
And he’d say, “Ahhhhhhh!”
Actually, it is kind of neat looking.
I know we signed some agreement that the moon is the property of the whole world, but we can still landmine it, right?
I wonder if in the President’s busy schedule he’s remembered to test the smoke detectors. Canada could always attack again.
Joe Lieberman does look a lot like Emperor Palpatine, but the lightning he fires from his fingertips is a completely different color.
How could Obama be sexist? He doesn’t even seem quite aware of the fact that he’s a man.
Were dunce caps a real thing? And did it work on teaching kids not to be stupid?
People who say “teabagger” will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes. And then they’ll get pegged with a tennis ball.
When the revolution comes, we’ll consider letting liberals in our new country, but they’ll first have to do the truffle shuffle.
The public option would be analogous to the Trojan Horse if you could hear Greeks in it loudly saying, “I can’t wait to kill Trojans!”
Someone explain to me how hundreds-of-years-old vampires going after seventeen-year-old girls is anything other than intensely creepy.
I stopped reading Highlights because of the liberal bias in its reporting. Once in the “What’s Wrong” picture they had two men getting married and a Bible in a school. Guess which one you were supposed to circle.
Did Microsoft test IE 8 on any websites before releasing it?
Where do babies come from?
All this time, you thought it had something to do with “when a man loves a woman…” Or, maybe a Barry White song instead of a Percy Sledge (or Michael Bolton) song.
That is so early 21st century. We’ve moved beyond that.
Scientists have created eggs and sperm from stem cells.
Scientists at Stanford University in California found the right cocktail of chemicals and vitamins to coax the cells into becoming eggs and sperm.
The sperm had heads and short tails and are thought to have been mature enough to fertilise an egg.
The eggs were at a much earlier stage but were still much more developed than any created so far by other scientists.
While this is certainly interesting, what if babies realize that they don’t need men or women in order to be born?
Sure, the average baby isn’t all that smart. A typical infant is only slightly smarter than the average Democrat. But what about those Baby Einsteins that the Disney company made smart?
Don’t be fooled. Those Baby Einsteins are smart. They figured out how to get smart, then get their money back from Disney. Scary smart, those Baby Einsteins.
So, if smart babies learn how to make other babies, they’d probably make more smart babies. Then we’d be overrun with smart babies.
Not worried about that? Read that whole article again. Especially this part:
The science also raises the possibility of ‘male eggs’ made from men’s skin and ‘female sperm’ from women’s skin.
This would allow gay couples to have children genetically their own
Think about this. What if genius gay babies try to take over the world?
You know what? They’ll succeed?
Who would fight them? If it was Godzilla, we’d send the Army out to fight them. But it’s not Godzilla. It’s smart gay babies. We can’t send the Army to fight smart gay babies. They’re babies, for crying out loud.
On the other hand, maybe Obama would make his mind up to take a stand against smart gay babies. But I doubt it.
Smart babies, yes, he’d send the troops to fight against. But smart gay babies? That’s part of his constituency. The gay part, not the baby part. Or the smart part.
So, if babies tried to take over the world, Obama would fight against them. But if smart gay babies try, we’re screwed.
And not in the way that we used to make babies.
If you listened to Fred Thompson Show today, you might have heard something familiar as they used this as the lead in from a commercial break:
You can find audio for the show today here and hear it in the show and Fred’s reaction at about 11:23 (first time a Fred Thompson fact gets official confirmation).
When Fred Thompson uses material from your blog, you have to ask him for permission.
If you have seen it yet, here’s a graph of what’s been happening to newspaper subscription rates over the past two decades. Bad omen for anyone who likes to turn his news into a captain’s hat when he’s done with it.
Man, I do not like the public option. For all their faults, conservatives tell you what they want and then they try and get it. Liberals know that their ultimate goals, though, would be abhorrent to anyone who loves liberty so they try to hide what they want. They want a government takeover of health care and the removal of individual liberty on that issue, but that’s a hard sell. So they get the public option, which they sell as greater liberty (“more choice!”), but the idea is it will eventually push out everything else and lead to a government takeover. That’s its only purpose, and a line in the sand has to be drawn by every Republican.
Or maybe Joe Lieberman.
The government always pretty much just grows and never shrinks. It’s always too politically hard to get rid of welfare and handouts after people have grown used to them, so you have to kill them in their infancy… like drowning puppies.
It’s kinda disheartening knowing this is a battle we will eventually lose. Not today, not tomorrow, and maybe not for hundreds of years if we’re smart, but eventually the government will get so large and liberty so narrow that the country will collapse. It will be a miserable time with the only thing to look forward to being the fact that we can now punch all the hippies we want with no one to stop us. It’s like that Thomas Jefferson quote that about the revolution, blood, and the tree of liberty that crazy people are always bringing up. Take it as a warning, though, as a revolution is just likely to make something even screwier. It was kinda amazing what the Founding Fathers put together with this country, and it’s our duty to make it limp along for as long as we can.
So it’s up to you, Joe Lieberman.
WASHINGTON DC (AP) – After it was widely reported that Democrat Congressman Alan Grayson of Florida called Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke’s aide and former Enron lobbyist, Linda Robertson, “a K Street whore“, prostitutes working the K Street area demanded an apology.
Silky Sparkles, spokestrollop for the Washington D.C. Adult Companionship Workers Local 269, said that she and her fellow K Street strumpets objected to Grayson’s demeaning use of the word “whore”.
“Being a whore is an honorable profession,” said Ms. Sparkles. “Sure, we do disgusting things with lonely, smelly, fat guys – like Mr. Grayson – in exchange for money, but Robertson lobbied for Enron. I mean… EWWWWW! It’s like, yeah, for enough Benjamins I’ll do ya a Cleveland Clamper or a Seattle Sashimi, but I’ve got STANDARDS! No Denver Danglers, and no working for Enron.”
National Organization for Women (NOW) President Kim Gandy also found the incident disturbing.
“The word ‘whore’ is deeply offensive to all women,” said Gandy. “It’s often reserved for women who step beyond male-patrolled sexual boundaries and is an obscene and especially degrading put-down toward a woman whose only crime is earning a living. However, since Grayson is a Democrat, we’re totally going to let this one slide. Besides, why would we stick up for some stupid whore Republican?”
When informed that Robertson was a Democrat, Gandy shrugged and replied, “Whatever. We mind our own business with Blue-on-Blue.”
After originally having his staff tell reporters to “go check the second definition of ‘whore’ in your stupid whore dictionaries, you damn news whores!”, Grayson later held a press conference where he apologized.
“Some people,” said Grayson, “were offended by my use of the word ‘whore’. I ask you to note that I could’ve called Robertson a chancrous, ill-mannered, gutter-slut – but I didn’t. I could’ve called her a crack-addled, knee-padding, man-gargler – but I didn’t. But I did call her a ‘whore’ – in the context of the debate over whether the Federal Reserve should be independently audited – and for that slip of the tongue… I apologize.”
“As for you actual K Street whores,” concluded Grayson, “I’ll be by later tonight for my Denver Dangler.”