A National Review reporter was issued 3 Obamaphones she wasn’t qualified for, even though she didn’t lie on the forms.
Any chance we could appoint a panel to rule on terminations for THIS program?
3 Comments
The government has plenty of money (yours) for free Obamaphones for everyone who asks for one, but still can’t find the money for volunteer interns to conduct tours of Obama’s (apparently, not yours) White House.
Meanwhile,
U.S. Spending $653K to ‘Reduce Tobacco Use’ Among Brazilian Women CNSNews / August 08, 2013
(CNSNews.com) – The National Institutes of Health is funding a program to convince female “light-smokers” in Brazil to kick their bad habit, at a cost to American taxpayers of $653,190.
“There is a great need for the development of gender-relevant tobacco control efforts,” the description of the study on the NIH website reads.
I understand it’s impossible to root out fraud entirely, but shouldn’t defrauding the U.S. taxpayer (not to mention our children & grandchildren & great grandchildren) at least require you to actually LIE?
Seems to me that people are down on the Obamaphone concept without fully analyzing its benefits. You must stop looking at them as phones and realize that they are crucial data collecting devices for NSA, FBI, and DHS.
The government has plenty of money (yours) for free Obamaphones for everyone who asks for one, but still can’t find the money for volunteer interns to conduct tours of Obama’s (apparently, not yours) White House.
Meanwhile,
I understand it’s impossible to root out fraud entirely, but shouldn’t defrauding the U.S. taxpayer (not to mention our children & grandchildren & great grandchildren) at least require you to actually LIE?
Seems to me that people are down on the Obamaphone concept without fully analyzing its benefits. You must stop looking at them as phones and realize that they are crucial data collecting devices for NSA, FBI, and DHS.