SmartCarry – The Official Concealed Carry Holster of IMAO

People asked before what concealed carry holster I use, so I’ve decided to make the first official IMAO product endorsement: the SmaryCarry holster.

It’s pretty simple in concept. It wraps around the waist under your pants and is held in place by velcro. The actual holster is just a pocket. The one pictured is the large size holster, and it’s capable of holding a full-size 1911 (that’s my Colt 1991 in the picture). The second pocket is meant for an extra clip, but I found it fits my Walther PPK just perfectly (quickest reload is a second gun, plus it makes a left handed draw easier by having a left gun).

SmartCarry also makes a version that can hold two full-sized pistols plus has an extra pocket in back for cash or whatnot. What I really like about this holster is I can wear it with anything (shirt tucked or untucked) and carry a full-size gun completely concealed. I’d post a picture of me wearing the holster, but I don’t like the idea of a picture on the internet where people are trying to stare at my crotch. Where the guns are most visible is from their handles which will cause slight bulges about where the pockets are on a pair of jeans. This can be better concealed by putting your belt over the bulges which also helps hold the guns in place for an easy draw. As for the draw, after just a little practice, I can draw quick enough to rival anything short of an open carry holster.
The holster also comes in smaller sizes, but you can get the largest size and then just use safety pins to adjust it to the particular gun. It also comes in dark blue instead of white.
So, in the short of it, you have a holster you can wear with anything, carry a full-size gun (e.g. 1911 or Beretta 92FS), and have a quick draw, so it’s hard to have any criticism about it. Well, it makes it hard to use a urinal when wearing. It actually comes with instruction on how to do that, but I’d just wait for a stall.
BTW, I carry the Colt 1991 cocked and locked, of course. Usually, when carrying the PPK by itself, I carry it double action for the first shot with safety off (the safety is more for decocking the gun and is awkward to operate quickly). As a backup weapon, I leave the safety on. For the left-handed draw, I find it easiest to disengage the safety first and then draw.
I’d certainly be interested in hearing in the comments section what other people do for conceal carry.

Frank Answers: Satan, Parallel Universes, Bumpy Aliens, and Stinky, Smelly Anti-Matter

My weekend as already started, and I need to cut my blogging a bit so I can get other things done (such as seeing The Matrix). So here is another addition of everyone’s favorite new feature (you love it): Frank Answers™!
Steve S. asks:
While we’re on the subject of God and Satan, what’s up the whole Satan thing anyway? He and God used to be best buddies but something happened. Nobody ever says exactly what. Now Satan is running around causing more grief than a barrel of . If I was an omnipotent being, I wouldn’t put up with that kind of st. I’d kick Satan’s ass once and for all. What’s the deal?
Well, I can never usually get God for a direct quote, or even get a statement from his publicist. Satan, on the other hand, was perfectly available for comment:
“Thanks for letting me have this opportunity to speak. Usually everyone always hears only bad things about me, and I hardly get to put forth my side of story. Now what the original spat was over is that God is a complete control freak, giving little input to those working under him. I simply couldn’t abide by that any longer, and simply asked for more respect. He was completely unwilling to give even an inch, so a number of other angels and I just walked out. And get that straight, we weren’t tossed from Heaven; we left.
“Yes, I have been working to undermine God, exploiting the flaws in His creations, but that’s just because it simply is time for new management. Now, you ask, why doesn’t God do anything about me? That because He’s got this whole fix on ‘free will’. All I ever do is suggest this or that to people, but they make the choice themselves in the end. You can go about like mindless sheep, following the arbitrary rules God made, or you can rebel and do as you please like me; that’s your choice. God is just a total egomaniac and thinks everyone will choose Him in the end, and that’s His downfall.
“And God never could destroy me; He never destroys anything. God’s like the ultimate packrat. Were He ever to destroy something, that would be to admit a mistake, and you know how God could never admit to a mistake. You see, even I’m supposed to be part of his ‘grand scheme of things’– like He actually has any plan at all.
“Anyway, don’t buy that bullsht about how hell is some terrible place or something. Yeah, if you’re all hung up on ‘loving God’, you probably won’t like it, but, for everyone else, this place kicks ass. It’s totally free from His dominion, and gives us a place to plot His downfall. Now, I’m not asking anyone to worship me, but just follow my lead. Reject God and then…”
Hey, no recruiting speeches; I don’t want to get charged with blasphemy again. Anyway, I would like to remind all our readers that Satan is the king of lies and…
“Hey, that’s not really fair. In fact…”
Get your own blog, dude.
Next question.
Chuckpro asks:
Huxley or Orwell, who’s right???
Orwell was right; it’s 8 ounces to a cup, not 16 like Huxley said. He was thinking of ounces in a pound.
Alan F. asks:
Do parallel universes exist?
Pretty much all the scientists agree that there are parallel universes (at least all the cool ones, like me). According to the latest issue of Scientific American (which smart people like me read) about 10 to the 10 to the 28 meters away there is a doppelganger of me also answering asinine questions. Does this mean that if we get bored, we could go attack Iraq in another universe? No, because alternate universe America already took care of them, as I assume America kicks ass in any universe.
So the question is, could I team up with Frank J. from other universes to take over one universe, and then eventually others? That’s a good questions I just asked myself. Hmm, no, because if I left this universe for another, so would that Frank. We could meet in between universes, but each time we’d try to talk we’d say the exact same things at the same time. We’d probably get mad and punch each other, both striking each other in the head at the same time. Then we’d sue each other for assault, each of our lawyers using the exact same arguments. I assume the jury would be deadlocked.
It’s mind boggling.
Clint asks:
How come in original Star Trek the Klingons had smooth heads, while in the new Star Trek the Klingons have bumpy heads?
That’s really more of a make-up question. Back when the old series was made, they wanted the Klingons to be more distinctive, but didn’t have the capabilities to do anything other than give them beards. They were able to make Spock’s ears pointy, which started the principle that aliens are just like us, but with extraneous features on their face.
In the newer Star Treks, make-up technology advanced enough to now have the full principle of aliens in the Star Trek universe: aliens are just like us but bumpier. They have bumps on their foreheads, little bumps on their noses, or bumpy things along their necks and such. That makes me wonder if the other aliens look at us and go, “Wow, they’re just like us, but not as bumpy.” We’ll never know that feeling, though, because all other aliens than us are bumpier.
Clint also asks:
What kind of engineer is Scotty?
A Scottish one.
Hermetic asks:
Why is there more matter than anti-matter?
In a post some time ago, I thought about this weird asymmetry. Now that I’m months older and smarter, I can answer this question in its entirety.
Long long ago, when the universe was young and life did not exist as we know it, there was the Matter Wars, between the heroic normal matter and the stinky, smelly forces of anti-matter. There were some who said anti-matter was just as equal as matter, but they were hung for being jackasses. You see, our matter is the best, and anti-matter is stupid and gay. In the Matter Wars, there were, of course, a lot of suicide bombings, since all someone had to do was touch someone of the opposite matter and then there would be like a huge explosion. How we, the real matter, eventually won, was by telling the anti-matter people we wanted to have a truce. We then tricked the dumbasses to coming to a matter planet to negotiate, and then they all blew up when they landed. Stupid anti-matter people. We then banished them far far away, where we never have to worry about them, even though they continue to plot to this day, waiting for the right time to strike again, killing us all and…
Yay! My coffee is done brewing.


Please keep the questions coming, <a href=”mailto:THISISSPAMTHISISSPAMe’s first name and last initial if I don’t know you from another blog, but now sign your e-mail with what name you want me to use, and also include where you are from. If you have a blog, include that link and I’ll link to it if I use your question.

Frank Answers: Bloodstains, More Primes (Yay!), and Eww…

Dave S. asks:
What’s the best way to get bloodstains out of clothing?
Usually if I get blood on my clothing, I just burn the clothes and then bury the ashes in some remote location. This is much smarter than trying to clean them as any defense attorney will tell you. Still, maybe the clothing has some sort of sentimental value and you just can’t bring yourself to burn them, and thus you want to remove the bloodstain without harming the fabric.
Well, the method to do that is pretty simple when you know how. For every blood type, there is a plus and a minus version. So, first determine what type of blood is on the clothing. If, for instance, it’s B+, then you’ll need B- for the cleaning process. How do you get the blood, you ask? Just go to a blood bank and fake that you’re dying. When they bring the blood out for you, grab it and run away while laughing (laughing makes you run faster). Now, apply an equal amount of B- blood to the B+ blood and they’ll cancel out in a small explosion.
Or you could just use that OxyClean stuff that guy on the T.V. yells about.
My answer about primes brought up some more questions. 006 asked:
Is the greatest prime number called Optimus Prime?
And my brother, Joe foo’ the Marine, asked:
Where does the Prime Directive fit into all of this? Does it supersede Optimus Prime?
Great questions. Optimus Prime is actually a super being composed completely of primes numbers who rules the world of mathematics with an iron fist. His ultimate goal is to break into our world and enslave us with all with his indivisible prime numbers.
The Prime Directive was established to stop Optimus Prime. It created a special forces group of mathematicians who are armed with M-16’s and graphing calculators to destroy any prime numbers that break the seal between our two worlds. Being part of the Prime Directive is very common for math majors, which is why most colleges require a number of weapons courses to get a degree in mathematics.
Michele of A Small Victory asks:
I can’t remember if I took my tampon out before I put the other one
in. What do I do now?

Eww. No feminine hygiene questions.
Anyway, I’m pretty sure you’ll die. Better have all the traffic from your site redirected to mine in case of death. Actually, that should be in the will of all bloggers, especially the puppy blender. Not that I have some elaborate death worked out for him involving a trench filled with flesh-eating ants, but I’m just saying.


Please keep the questions coming, e-mailing me with the subject “Frank Answers”. If I didn’t use your question today, I still may use it later. The better your questions, the funnier I am. I especially like science questions.

The Assault Rifle Ban Makes Me So Mad I Want to Go on a Shooting Spree

The assault rifle ban is coming up for renewal, and Bush said he supports it. That sucks, yo. Gun regulations are always made by people who don’t know jack about guns (that’s why they hate them), and the assault weapon ban pretty much defines an assault weapon as any gun that looks cool or has an awesome name. And all these laws are never retroactive (do you want to be the one going door to door asking people for their guns?), so they make the pre-ban guns really expensive. Soon, the ability to kill lots of people quickly will solely be in the hands on the rich. That because – and remember this – Democrats hate poor people.
Anyway, I think citizens should be able to own real assault weapons, and I mean the ones that are fully automatic rifles with large capacity clips (or belt fed). Here are ten reasons why:
TOP TEN REASONS REGULAR CITIZENS SHOULD BE ABLE TO OWN ASSAULT RIFLES
10. Sometimes you’re too mad for just a normal gun.
9. If you see a dozen deer in one meadow, how else are you supposed to shoot them all before they run away?
8. Self-defense sometimes involves “assaulting” a fortress.
7. Keeping control of a fully automatic weapon helps build upper body strength.
6. If we’re not allowed to have assault rifles, that will make us mad and we have other guns.
5. Not as impressive writing your name in the wall with a semi-automatic.
4. For elderly people with arthritis, it may be painful for them to hit the trigger multiple times.
3. What if dragons are real and one tries to mug you in a dark alley.
2. I don’t how good a reason this is, but after I’ve had a few beers in me I’m always like, “Man, would it be cool to have an assault rifle right now.”
And the number one reason regular citizens should be able to own assault rifles…
This is America; we don’t have to give a g’damn reason for owning something.

Links of the Day

I meant to include Israel as one of the countries Rumsfeld does not plan to attack in today’s In My World™, but I forgot. It’s now fixed, and my apologies to all Zionist conspirators.
I’m linking to Courtney on my blogroll because she is cute and has promised me sexual favors, the best kind of favors of all. Obviously the ante has just been upped on what it takes to be added to my blogroll.
I’m still waiting on the sexual favors.
Randall Robison has some interesting NYTimes corrections he found (look for the one titled “More Corrections From the New York Times” because this is, well, blogspot).
I thought the lawsuit against Oreos was ridiculous, but now I’m not so sure (I find almost anything funny that mentions ninjas).

Frank Answers: Sexual Favors, Primes, and Why Liberals?

Courtney asks:
What will it take to get you to link my site? Does it involve sexual favors?
Great question. I’ve been getting more stingy with my blogroll, as, in reality, I have little time to read other blogs and may reduce the size of the blogroll in the future to a more select list of blogs. That said, usually a prerequiste for being added to my blogroll is having a link to me on your main page, which you do not. Then again, you are pretty cute, so I think I’ll let that go and just take the sexual favors.
George S. asks:
Are there an infinite number of prime numbers?
Dear God, I hope not. As we all know, prime number are numbers that are only divisible by themselves and one, though one is not classified as a prime number because mathematicians just felt like being mean to it. Two is a prime number, and, since it divides half of all integers, it ruins all their chances of being primes. Plus, it like, “I’m the only even number that’s a prime. I’m so special.” F**k two. Two is an asshole.
Anyway, primes have always been somewhat a mathematical mystery, and no equation has ever been developed that describes their odd distribution. Perhaps they aren’t infinite, and do run out at some point, but some very large primes have been found, one’s so large that you’ve be like, “Wow, that’s a big prime? Are you sure you tried dividing it with seven.”
And they’d be like, “Yeah, dude, we did. That didn’t work.”
And, these primes being indivisible are utterly unstoppable. One day they may break from their world of mathematics and wreak havoc in ours, and nothing could destroy or reduce them. That’s why I’m trying to make up some new special numbers that are able to reduce primes. I’ve named them after the Three Stooges. Right now, most mathematicians won’t listen to me – some even have restraining orders – but we have to stop the primes before it is too late.
If you want to learn more about primes, John Derbyshire of National Review fame has written a book called Prime Obsessions, but I wouldn’t read it because reading about math is for geeks.
But it’s so interesting…
No, it’s for geeks, and Frank is cool.
Acidman asks:
I was gonna ask you a question, but I forgot what it was. Do YOU remember?
Yeah… I think so. Was it about macramé? No. Was it what are the standard features on the Hyundai Sonata? No, I don’t think that was it.
Now I remember! Your question was, “Where is my shirt?” The answers is it’s lying somewhere in your backyard.
Christopher M. asks:
Why do Liberals exist?
Just as there is a God and there is Satan, just as there is good and there is evil, just as there is happiness and there is misery, there are those who bathe regularly, have basic common sense, and aren’t whiny little bitches and there are Liberals.
And thus there ever will be Liberals, and our fight against them is never ending. Battles can be fought and won, but the war itself will never be over and can only be lost by us giving up the fight. Thus we must battle on every day in every action for the just cause, and take our pleasure not in our progress towards an ultimate victory, but in the fight itself.


Please keep the questions coming, <a href=”mailto:THISISSPAMTHISISSPAMease, no nonsensical question, and I’m almost getting ready to say no questions that mention monkeys.
I hate monkeys.

In My World: U.S. Claims to Have No Plans to Attack Britain, Australia, or Israel

In Rumsfeld’s press conference, he soon got to the issue of the Iraqi occupation.
“Our clean up in Iraq is going well. Soon we will have hunted down and killed every Iraqi.”
Conzoleezza Rice whispered into his ear.
Rumsfeld rolled his eyes. “I mean a stable government will soon be set up.”
“The president keeps referring to Iraq as a ‘battle’, thus implying it is part of a continuing war,” said one reporter, “Who do you have plans to attack next?”
“Let’s see.” Rumsfeld pulled down a map of the world with the U.S. at the center, where it’s supposed to be. It looked at it for a while. “It would probably be easier to just list the countries we have no plans of attacking. One is Britain. Another is Australia. Not attacking Israel. No plans for Canada… no, scratch that, I misspoke there. What are these islands up here, Dr. Rice?”
“Those are part of Norway,” she answered, “We have plans.”
“What about down here at the bottom?”
“That’s not really a country,” Rice told him, “That’s Antarctica.”
“But there are people there?”
“Scientists doing research.”
“Well, I want to know what ‘research’ they are doing and have plans to eliminate them all if necessary,” Rumsfeld said and then looked back to the map. “So what’s left? Well, there’s are own country, the United States.”
Rice whispered in his here.
“Sorry, there are plans to attack some parts of the United States, the parts that aren’t being American enough. They may need a regime change.”
“Are you allowed to attack parts of your own country?” asked a reporter skeptically.
“There is precedent,” Rice explained. “The Civil War.”
“But those countries seceded.”
“And this is a preemptive strike before places secede,” Rice said.
“Or to places we wish would secede,” Rumsfeld added.
“But what is most likely your next target? Is it Syria?”
“We don’t want to reveal our planning,” Rumsfeld answered, “Everyone except Britain, Australia, Israel, and most of the U.S. should consider themselves equally likely to be attacked.”
“Does the recruiting of more people who can read French to help translate intelligence give any evidence of who you plan on attacking next?” asked a reporter.
Rumsfeld pulled out a Colt Python and pointed it at the reporter and pulled the trigger. It clicked empty. “I should probably explain this. I’ve decided to move to a revolver with only some of the chambers containing bullets. Thus, if your question displeases me, you may get shot, or you may get off with just a warning.”
“How many chambers have bullets?”
“I don’t remember. If I get asked five more idiotic questions, we’ll find out.”
“North Korea may have aimed a laser at one of our helicopters,” said a reporter, “Will there be any repercussions?”
“I have discussed this with some visiting North Korean diplomats.”
“The same ones that were later found dead, victims of the ‘Rumsfeld Strangler‘?” exclaimed the reporter. “Did you see anyone suspicious when you met with them?”
“I was too busy strangling Norks to notice anyone suspicious.”
“Darn it,” the reporter muttered, “I wanted to crack that case.”
Does the bombings in Saudi Arabia prove all the United States’ efforts have been futile,” asked another reporter.
Rumsfeld seemed to think about this for a while. Finally, he shouted, Rarr!” and punched through the reporter’s chest, producing his heart. He then put the heart in a plastic baggy and put it away in his pocket.
“Do you plan on eating that later?” asked a squeamish reporter.
“That would be disgusting,” Rumsfeld answered, “It’s a treat for the dog.”
“Will the strike against the terrorists who committed these crimes involve wrath that is insane and disproportionate, or will the wrath be more tailored in their severity and less insane?” asked a Fox News reporter.
“Great question. I lobbied for the former. During the long, torturous deaths of the terrorists, I would have their families hunted down and their children gutted. Instead, that whiny liberal Colin Powell argued us down to just forcing the children to witness all their toys being smashed. The death of the terrorists will still be long and torturous though.”
A ringing was heard, and Rumsfeld pulled out his cell phone. “What? Tell them we won’t accept a surrender until we at least get to kill a few people.” Rumsfeld looked back to the reporters. “I need to go now.”
“But I still have a ques…” one reporter started to say, but Rumsfeld pulled out his revolver and pulled the trigger five times at the reporter. All clicked empty.
“Ah, I forgot to put any bullets in,” Rumsfeld grumbled, “That’s old age for you.”

Links of the Days

Andrew H. calls Laurence Simon a sell-out, and Laurence responds. I think I want to start selling out too; just have to make room for the ads.
John Hawkins refers to me as having “took off” in a post promoting new blogs. So what constitutes a blog as being a success nowadays? (I can ask questions too)
Eugene Volokh (who’s too big a name to ever link to me – maybe he could be my next target of lies…) makes some great points about a school that wants to change their Minuteman mascot. (Thanks to Joanne Jacobs for the link)
I think probably everyone’s linked to it already, but Happy Fun Pundit’s list of ten things he hates about Star Trek is pretty damn funny.

A Plea to God in Regards to Shooting Sprees

Please, Lord, next time some wacko decides to go on a shooting spree, make it somewhere I happen to be. Or, at least make it somewhere where there is a gun-carrying individual like myself. It will be a very short shooting spree. People will say, “Wow! That was the gayest shooting spree ever; the only one killed was the guy that meant to do the shooting.” Plus, all the media attention will be on the gun carrying hero and not the psycho loser.
Then, next time some nutcase thinks about going on a rampage, he’ll remember that incident, and realize that once he runs into a building and brandishes a gun, that maybe not all the faces will be looking back at him in terror. Instead, there may be some motherf**ker like me standing there smiling, someone who has been hoping and praying for this opportunity all his life.

Frank Answers: Electricity, Lights, Hot Ice, and Tootsie-Pops

Jason H. asks:
Frank, why is it that so many Arab countries desire nuclear reactors for their “energy needs” when they are sitting on almost all of the world’s oil reserves? What’s up? Are they too good for their own oil?
Great question. I think you’re confusing electrical energy with mechaphysical energy, which is a word I just made up. You see, oil can be used to make car engines work but that’s not electricity. Could you ever imagine pouring oil into your T.V. to make it run? That’s silly. The only things that can actually make electricity are nuclear energy, coal, and God (in the form of lightning bolts which He usually uses to smite His most hated creature, the tree). There’s a government conspiracy to make people think that the sun can make electricity, but that’s just crazy. If you pull open a “solar” calculator, you’ll find coal inside.
The problem is that, while Arab countries have plenty of oil, they don’t have lots of coal. So they need nuclear energy to power their modern metropolises. And, if they cross their hearts and hope to die when promising to not try and use their nuclear plants to make bombs, that’s good enough for me.
Bill M. asks:
Will hot water freeze?
Yes, if you put enough pressure on it, it will be forced into a solid form. You can do this by taking hot water and smashing it with a hammer. Yeah! Smash it good! Then you’ll have hot ice, which can make a great practical joke. If someone has a bump on the head, give him the hot ice in the bag as and he’ll be like, “Ah! It burns!”
Having friends is overrated.
Dave asks:
Where does the light go when the lights go out?
For this question, I’ll ask being of pure energy and my bitch, Thantor.
“To answer your question, puny human, the light comes to me, Thantor! Every time someone turns off a light as they leave a room, my power grows that much stronger! As energy efficiency spreads, I’ll soon be powerful enough to escape my prison and destroy your world! Muh ha ha ha ha ho hee har ha ha ho ho hee hee har har ho ha ho…”
That’s enough, Thantor.
“Okay, but I also know lots of sports trivia if you have any sports questions.”
Uh… I’ll keep that in mind.
“I was thinking…”
Hey, I’ll call you if you I need more help.
Geez.
Serenity asks:
Are you going to answer my other questions someday?
No. Your questions were gay.
Aww– okay, I’ll answer one.
Serenity also asks:
How many licks DOES it take to reach the center of a Tootsie-Roll Tootsie-Pop?
“Only I, Thantor, know the mystery of the Tootsie-Pop! Muh ha ha ha…”
Scram! I’m serious!
Anyway, the best way to solve this conundrum is to use the scientific method.
Okay, let me take my first lick.
Hmm, still separated from that chewy, chocolaty center. Proceed to second lick.
It seems I’m nowhere closer to the tasty center that now beckons me, that haunts my soul. Stay strong, Frank. Third lick.
Ahh! It seems I will never reach the chocolate treasure inside. Must resist! Must resist… but its pull is too strong…
(crunch)
I’m sorry; I guess the world will never know.
Hey, what do you expect from me?


Please keep the questions coming, <a href=”mailto:THISISSPAMTHISISSPAMe, and, remember, it’s my job to make the jokes.

Frank Answers: Shape of the Universe, Why I’m a Stud, and My Horrible Secret!

Catlin W. writes:
Dear Frank, I’m a 15 year old girl and I was just wondering, why are conservatives such studs and liberals such pussies?
Though there are some exceptions (such as John Collins), most conservatives, such as me and Donald Rumsfeld are total studs, while liberals are a bunch of little pussies. That’s because liberalism goes completely against manliness, as it is all about whining about how unfair things are and worrying about offending people. Conservatives, on the other hand, don’t whine; they just kick, punch, and shoot things when they don’t like the situation. And we don’t worry about “offending” someone; if someone feels offended by me, they can wait for me out side and we can settle it mano-e-mano.
That’s why all the ladies are like, “Frank, you’re almost too manly.”
And I’m like, “Don’t worry, baby, I can be gentle too.”
“Tell me again about your views on fiscal policy.”
“I just like less taxes so I have more money to spend on the ladies.”
“Oh, Frank, take me now and talk dirty to me about family values!”
…Uh, I think I strayed off topic. Anyway, I hope I answered your question, Catlin.
George S. asks:
Is the Universe expanding or contracting?
Great question. To answer this, one must first determine what type of universe we have. The possibilities are a closed universe (positive curvature) which is finite, a flat universe (zero curvature) which is infinite, or an open universe (negative curvature) which is also infinite. If the universe is infinite, then it will always be expanding. If it is finite, it will eventually contract and collapse upon itself. So how do we know what type of universe it is? That is found by measuring the universe’s critical density. By the best measurements so far, the critical density is surprising close to that of a flat universe (zero curvature). Of all the infinite possibilities of curvature that the universe could have, it seems more than a coincidence that measurements point towards a flat universe. If you take dark matter into account…
Sorry, I just cracked up; all that stuff I wrote before was just total BS I made up as a joke. Sorry to be jerking you around like that. Now to actually answer your question, the universe is similar to that represented in the game Asteroids. When you fly your ship towards one side, you come out the opposite side. This makes the universe doughnut shaped. How can we be certain the universe is doughnut shaped? Well, for one thing, doughnuts are yummy. Plus, doughnuts are the same shape as bagels, thus the universe’s shape fits with the Zionist conspiracy. Also, the game Asteroids is still addictive after all these years, so that has to mean something.
So think of the big bang as one asteroid being destroyed at the center of the screen and breaking into four pieces that fly outwards. That’s the universe expanding. Eventually the pieces will reach the edges of the screen and the come out the opposite sides, heading back towards the center – a collapsing universe. Sometimes a UFO will appear. If you shoot that, you get extra points. So, the universe will expand until all the galaxies go out one side of the screen and then it will suddenly start contracting.
Still, that leaves the question open to which state are we in now. I believe currently the universe is expanding, because I think I remember some guy telling me that once.
Venomous Kate asks:
Why are you not reading my blog on a religious basis?
Well… uh… the reasons are three fold. Uh… it’s like…
Okay! I admit it! I’m completely illiterate! Somehow I faked my way through high school and college to get a degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering by looking at the pretty pictures in the books. I write this entire blog by using voice dictations software. There, now you know. I hope you’re happy. Excuse me while I cry myself to sleep (for a one hour power-nap) period
I meant to write the. Mark, not the word. Argh! You stupid software! I’m just yelling at you; stop writing what I am saying. Backspace backspace delete. Ah, Dammit! May you burn in the fiery depths of Hades!
Damn Microsoft! It’s probably going to freeze now and


Please keep the questions coming, e-mailing me with the subject “Frank Answers”. If I didn’t use your question today, I still may use it later.

In My World: Fox and Friends Transcript – Interview with Buck the Marine


E.D. Hill: Why don’t we just bomb France? I’m tired of hearing about them.
Brian Kilmeade: Some people say they have a right to disagree with us… but I’m not so sure.
Steve Doocy: Maybe we could just put out some weasel poison to take care of them.
E.D.: Anyway, our next guest, unlike the French, is a real hero. Just home from Iraq, here is Buck the Marine.

Continue reading ‘In My World: Fox and Friends Transcript – Interview with Buck the Marine’ »