The Progress of the Term “Progressive”

Only 12% of the general public would describe themselves as “progressive,” but most people seem to be unsure what it means so that’s better that the term “liberal.” Liberals ruined the term “liberal” (which was a good term; I think “classical liberal” describes my politics better than “conservative”) by getting it associated with their arrogant, douchey politics so that “liberal” now means to most people “utterly useless idiot who thinks he’s smart and should force his ideas on everyone else,” so they tried to shed that term for a new one — “progressive” — and are slowly corroding its meaning too until eventually it will be toxic as well. Conservatives, on the other hand, took a term that wasn’t that great (why would you want to be a conservative when currently the status quo sucks?) and made it good by association. Now “conservative” just means to most Americans “someone with common sense.”

So next time instead of liberals taking an actual word people might want to use for other purposes and corrupting it, maybe they can just call themselves a completely made up term instead. Like “muckadoo” or something. That would be considerate of them, but then considerate of the population at large isn’t very progressive.

What Do Liberals Consider to Be Rights?

The NAACP took time off from looking for coded racism in greeting cards and calling anyone who disagrees with Democrats a racist to listen to Michelle Obama speak.

Yeah, I don’t know why they would do that, but the NAACP does seem to be full of fringe crazies these days, and that does sound like the wacky sort of thing a crazy person would do.

Anyway, so you’re wondering what inherent disdain or misunderstanding of basic American principles did Michelle display this time? Well, she said “dessert is not a right.”

Well, maybe she was taking a libertarian position and dessert isn’t a right because if you don’t have money to buy dessert, it’s not like the government is supposed to supply it for you. But then she said that health care is “a true civil right” which once again demonstrates that a liberal’s understand of rights is as coherent as a paranoid schizophrenic. So, back when this nation was first founded and no one had any health care someone today would consider worthwhile, who was infringing their civil rights? I’m going to go with the most evil thing known to man: rogue unicorns.

So why do liberals see things like abortion as a right but don’t think self-defense is — despite that being inherent to pretty much every creature? Because they like the word “rights” but don’t understand what those are. Basically, in the liberal world, you have no rights in far as you may conflict with their plan for the state. Icons of individual power like money, guns, and speech (when directed against the power of the state like in the Tea Party) they only see as threats and not rights. If liberals weren’t so good at quickly marginalizing themselves, we’d have a lot more to worry about than them taking away our ice cream.

Cultural Differences

With the release of Roman Polanski by the Swiss, I’ve noticed there is a growing cultural difference between America and Europe: We don’t like evil, but Europe feels it’s just too sophisticated to care about such things.

French culture minister (is it his job to make sure the Eiffel Tower is extra tall and impressive?) said of the Polanski release, “Now is the time for appeasement. [When isn’t it the time for appeasement with the French? -Ed.] The painful past, the rich personality, the unanimously admired works of Roman Polanski all find their place again.” See, Polanski made movies that, while no box office successes, smart people were supposed to like, which made them important… much more important than child rape.

In America we don’t get that attitude. Artsy-fartsy directors are a dime a dozen… and we probably weren’t going to watch those films anyway. What we do like watching is having a child rapist flung and shot with a cruise missile… along with anyone who objects to harsh punishments for child rapists.

So what do we do with Europe? Same thing we’ve been doing for a while: Wait for them to continue to wither and die and hope they leave us an inheritance.

Random Thoughts

Why do I have to go to a birthing class? I’m pretty sure at this point it will happen whether I contribute anything more or not.

“PUSH!”
“Plush? What’s plush?”
“No, I’m saying push to get the baby out.”
“Oh! I guess I should have gotten that from context.”

So should Mel Gibson do a comeback by starring in the next Roman Polanski film?

I think I’m going to start chewing tobacco ironically.

We may have reached the next level now where people do irony ironically.

Every time my cat stares at me, I think she’s weighing the pros and cons of eating my eyes.

I’m bored. Wanna start a rumor that Obama is a drug addict? It would explain a lot.

I think one party that’s been escaping the blame is the earth, which actually made the oil.

Maybe a Tea Party group should pass a resolution condemning the NAACP for being asinine.

Rehabilitating Mel

It must suck to be Mel Gibson right now. And I say “right now” because at one time, it was great to be Mel Gibson. Or so it seemed.

He had a bunch of hit movies. Like Lethal Weapon and Lethal Weapon 2 and Lethal Weapon 3 and …

Actually, he had a lot of hit movies … as well as some not so hit movies.

But, for a while, he was golden.

Now, not so much. First, there was his drunk driven arrest about four years back. Now, there’s the audio tapes (more than one) of his argument with his girlfriend. You usually have to attend a cabinet meeting featuring both Rahm Emanuel and Joe Biden to get that much crazy and profanity in one place.

Right now, if you read the news, Mel Gibson is seen at Satan incarnate. And, though he’s a talented actor, director and screenwriter, it seems that his career might be over. Unless he can be rehabilitated. But, is that possible? I think it might be.

It will be tough, though. Giving money to save the rain forest won’t work. He’s done that. Give millions to help sick children? Done that. No, that’s not nearly enough.

So, what would it take to rehabilitate Mel Gibson?

  • The promise to not make Mad Max 4.
  • The promise to not make Lethal Weapon 5.
  • The promise to not make What Women Want II.
  • Claim an oil spill that occurred 457 days after George Bush left office is Bush’s fault.
  • Claim a terrorist attack that occurred 234 days after George Bush took office is Bush’s fault.
  • Declare 9/11 an inside job.
  • Make a movie with Hugo Chavez.
  • Call the Tea Party “too white” then call for the only black on the Supreme Court to resign.
  • Drug and anally rape a 13-year-old girl.
  • Hang around a polling place with a bat, threatening to kill some crackers.

Perhaps this would be enough to return Mel Gibson to everyone’s good graces.

Is he crazy? Yeah, probably. But, he’s not the right kind of crazy. He needs to be batsh*t crazy, barking moonbat crazy, to get his career back.

I’m not sure it’s worth it.