9 Comments

  1. Ok, I bit on the link. I can only think of the immortal words of Ronaldus Magnus, “Trust, but verify” Ain’t no way in hell that’s a young Nancy Pelosi and I wanna see some bona fides on it’s provenance before I’ll fall for that. I followed enough Nude Kathy Ireland links in my day so this ain’t my first rodeo.

  2. Well the other two are certainly more believable than the first. And upon comparison of the three I there are too many inconsistencies between the first and the other two than between the last two. I’ll simply start with the fact that the first picture is obviously a “Glamour” shot which makes it suspect as something Pelosi would have been involved in, although I will concede that I don’t know much about her early career and it is quite possible she worked as model. There are other things as well so while the additional information is appreciated I will still retain my skepticism.

  3. @8 I knew it just didn’t look like her and the costume and pose didn’t scream 60’s like it should have if it were Pelosi in her ‘Prime’. [Being born in 1940 would have placed here best years 1960-1970.] [And that should not be taken as a general age for all women.]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.