What Do Liberals Consider to Be Rights?
The NAACP took time off from looking for coded racism in greeting cards and calling anyone who disagrees with Democrats a racist to listen to Michelle Obama speak.
Yeah, I don’t know why they would do that, but the NAACP does seem to be full of fringe crazies these days, and that does sound like the wacky sort of thing a crazy person would do.
Anyway, so you’re wondering what inherent disdain or misunderstanding of basic American principles did Michelle display this time? Well, she said “dessert is not a right.”
Well, maybe she was taking a libertarian position and dessert isn’t a right because if you don’t have money to buy dessert, it’s not like the government is supposed to supply it for you. But then she said that health care is “a true civil right” which once again demonstrates that a liberal’s understand of rights is as coherent as a paranoid schizophrenic. So, back when this nation was first founded and no one had any health care someone today would consider worthwhile, who was infringing their civil rights? I’m going to go with the most evil thing known to man: rogue unicorns.
So why do liberals see things like abortion as a right but don’t think self-defense is — despite that being inherent to pretty much every creature? Because they like the word “rights” but don’t understand what those are. Basically, in the liberal world, you have no rights in far as you may conflict with their plan for the state. Icons of individual power like money, guns, and speech (when directed against the power of the state like in the Tea Party) they only see as threats and not rights. If liberals weren’t so good at quickly marginalizing themselves, we’d have a lot more to worry about than them taking away our ice cream.













July 13th, 2010 at 1:05 pm
Well, you know how colored people are…and that’s a whole organization of them. Even black people hate colored people…just try referring to one as a “colored” and see how they react.
July 13th, 2010 at 1:07 pm
Michelle is proof that while free speech is guaranteed by the US Constitution, brains are not.
July 13th, 2010 at 1:11 pm
Well, they are adding a new word to our vocabulary. Sadger. A combination of sadness and anger. It is usually felt when you remember the people residing in the White House at the same time you read a Medal of Honor citation or the like.
It can also be a sad badger. Despite the name, a sad badger is still dangerous and should be shot on sight.
July 13th, 2010 at 1:12 pm
So uh. Wanna provide a citation for your dipshit assertion that “liberals don’t think self-defense is a right”?
How sad it must be to be you. All upset and bothered about things you made up in your own head.
[Let's say "most liberals" -- see Europe and any really blue state's gun laws for examples. -Ed.]
July 13th, 2010 at 1:19 pm
I failed the mandatory Race Relations Class they held overseas when I was in the military years ago. I knew then it was a waste of my time, as I do now. It just doesn’t get better, does it?
July 13th, 2010 at 1:26 pm
Jill, you might want to ask the troops that aren’t allowed to shoot back at people shooting at them about that…dumbass.
July 13th, 2010 at 2:16 pm
Wow, a liberal troll at IMAO. It’s been a while.
(When I hear the name “Jill,” I think back to a blond, liberal ditz I knew in school. Conservative ‘Jill’s', please stand up and defend your name!)
July 13th, 2010 at 2:22 pm
Here’s your current rights….1. You have the right to shut your mouth about Obama policies (unless you agree with them) pay your taxes in an uncomplaining manner and do as you’re told by the federal government when you’re told to do it. 2. If in doubt about any of your rights refer to rule one.
July 13th, 2010 at 2:33 pm
What is happening with NAACP is a symptom of a larger problem across the western world. We have run out of or run off the adults.
July 13th, 2010 at 2:37 pm
Jill, you’re kidding me, right? Read through the opinions of the four liberals on the Supreme Court from the latest Chicago guns case. Make sure you take off your dunce cap before reading and take particular care in making certain you don’t prove Frank’s assertion by trolling here when we have a gun rights post.
July 13th, 2010 at 2:39 pm
Want a citation, troll? How’s the UN? Liberals like the UN, right?
“Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations applies to States acting in self-defence
against armed attacks against their State sovereignty. It does not apply to situations of
self-defence for individual persons.” Barbara Frey’s report to the HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL
Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights – 2006
When will trolls start doing their own research?
July 13th, 2010 at 2:59 pm
She’d had better keep her damn wookie paws off my pecan pie. I have a fork and I know how to use it.
July 13th, 2010 at 3:33 pm
Seems like I remember a wise Latina who wouldn’t acknowledge that people have the right to self defense. And Kagan wouldn’t agree that Americans havce a natural right to self defense.
July 13th, 2010 at 3:59 pm
Senator “DUI” Kennedy introduced a certain Senate Bill No. 1 under Reagan which had less chance of passing then a liberal has of joining MENSA. Under SB1 it would be a federal felony not only to defend oneself, but your primary concern was for the bad guy’s rights. In case of a break in you were reqiured o flee your own home or face prosecution. If a family member was attacked you still had to flee, Bad guys have rights under liberals, You don’t.
July 13th, 2010 at 4:08 pm
Under liberals you have a right to pay their bills for them. If your lucky. Cracker.
July 13th, 2010 at 4:57 pm
@Storm: Even though Teddy’s Law didn’t pass, it is de facto law in liberal Massamachusetts. Use a firearm there to protect yourself from a deadly threat, and you are likely to be prosecuted, as was the case of the woman who shot a rapist who had broken into her apartment, and was also the case of my uncle who drew his legally carriedu handgun to protect himself from an attacker.
You’re not really high on the believing in right of self defense when you prosecute those who do defend themselves.
July 13th, 2010 at 5:08 pm
Sad Badgers aren’t dangerous they just get all weepy. Its manic depressive badgers you have to watch out for.
Unfortunately it is often hard to tell a Sadger from a MaDadger. Watch the Eyes. MaDadgers have crazy eyes.
July 13th, 2010 at 5:49 pm
“Dessert is not a right”? Kiss that big campaign contribution from Ben & Jerry’s good-bye.
July 13th, 2010 at 7:30 pm
What a racist move by the
National Association for Advancement of Colored People
to believe the lies of racebaiting Congress-folks, and smear T.E.A. partiers as racists. .
July 13th, 2010 at 8:13 pm
Wow, “Jill” appears to be an uniformed liberal…HOW unusual. The other day I was having a flame war with a liberal puke and he of course called me a racist, when I said “I suppose you don’t think Obama, Holder and that Black Panther guy are racists, right?”
His reply: What Black Panther guy?!?
It is better to remain silent and be thought a liberal idiot than open your mouth and remove all doubt.
July 13th, 2010 at 8:17 pm
Its manic depressive badgers you have to watch out for.
WE don’t use that derogatory term anymore, it might hurt someone’s feeeeeeeelings, please refer to them as Bi-Polar badgers.
Thank you.
July 13th, 2010 at 8:26 pm
Seems like if we have a right to medical care but don’t have a right to self-defense, we would be born with a stack of band-aids, not with two fists.
July 13th, 2010 at 9:06 pm
I feel sooo sorry for those 2 little girls.
They didn’t get to pick their parents.
But hang in there girls, you DO get to pick the nursing home your parents end up in!
July 13th, 2010 at 9:49 pm
Now that the NAALCP has condemned the Tea Party, I predict it will end up right next to the National Organization for Leftist Women. It too will be dismissed by mainstream Americans as a collection of political WHORES.
July 14th, 2010 at 7:41 am
we’d have a lot more to worry about than them taking away our ice cream
They’ll take away my ice cream when they pry it from my cold, dead fingers.