You may have heard mention of the North American Union on this blog (or, as I like to call it, the Vast Mexican Conspiracy) and are wondering what that is. It refers to the fact that President Bush is secretly meeting with the King of Canada and the Head Bandito of Mexico to combine all of North America into one country. Then we’ll all be forced to work in factories making them tortillas and hockey sticks. Also, I think the Jews are behind it somehow.
My advice: If you ever see Mexicans and Canadians talking to each other, kill them before they can further conspire against us.
The Mexicans are too lazy and the Canadians too stupid to execute this conspiracy. They are simply pawns being used by the joooos. Hebrew domination will be the New World Order.
I’ve always thought the Bush’s were a little too beady eyed to be real WASPs, and I hear that both W and HW are bad tippers.
If it is anything like this
hyperlink text
be afraid… be very afraid. Damn hippies!
You are right to call this the great Mexican Conspiracy. Everyone knows that Canada is infested by French people, so the Mexican Head Bandito knows that they will surrender to them after the NAU becomes the law.
Then all the gringos are off to the taco mines!
Dude be careful, if you expose the plot the KGB/CIA combined ops teams in the black helicopters will follow the color coded bars on backs of highway signs to disappear you to the mother ship.
Dude the dictatorship, the dictatorship.
Freemasons rule the country!
-Ron Paul 4 prez
It’s easy to get sucked into that whole thing. I do believe that there are important people in our government who would love an EU style socialist democracy. I don’t believe it is the end game of the Bush Administration. But the conspiracy nuts will grab any weird story to add fuel to their theories. The Campion/Ramos Border Patrol imprisonment was heinous and handled horribly, but it is nothing more complicated than weenie diplomacy directed at the la Raza crowd. It’s not a big wink-wink to Mexico that “It’s All Falling Into Place. Bwah-hahahahaha!”
Like all consipracies, the intricacies of this one render it ridiculous.
the NEU is to the Right as Truthers are to the Left.
the NAU is to the Right as Truthers are to the Left.
If the U.S. ever decides to merge with Canada and Mexico, it will simply invade and conquer them. That shouldn’t take more than a couple of days.
It’s real. Put your tinfoil hats on ASAP cause this conspiracy is true. To start with there will be a massive highway that connects all three countries. Search NAFTA Superhighway. I’m kind of surprised you guys don’t buy this one especially after the way Bush and some GOP members acted on the immigration bill. The big multinatioanl businesses have decided things will be cheaper for them with all three countries as one and Bush has been all about big business from the start. It’s not paranoia if they really are out to get you. And they are.
the Bush administration failed on immigration because of whispy notions of diplomacy and comity.
The Sooper Highway is just that. A highway. Some people think it’s a good way to move commerce.
If, if we formed a new union, it would simply mean we now own the whole continent. We would still be America. The Canadians and Mexicans all want to be us anyway.
Politicians and bureaucrats are too stupid to pull off such an elaborate plan.
…or are they?
I really…no, REALLY hate to agree with Sarcasm Man in any way, shape or form, but there is some truth to this. While Republicans as a whole haven’t publicly embraced this, Bush really is all for the North American Union concept, which should surprise no one, as he turned out to be a socialist like his father (and remember, this is the family that proudly adopted Bill Clinton as an honorary “son” and “brother”).
George W has actually made comments supporting the idea, and if you’ll recall the most unhinged we’ve seen him in 6-1/2 years was 1) when he found out that new border regulations are making it so you’ll need a passport into Canada, and 2) when we wouldn’t go along with granting automatic US citizenship to Mexicans. He would actually like to create a version of the EU. Don’t forget, his father’s the one who brought us the glorious vision of creating a “New World Order.” And, they’ve been fighting for some time about this mega-superhighway connecting Mexico and Canada that Sarcasm Man posted about.
If this post labels me a tinfoil hat wearer on this issue, I’ll wear it.
To start with there will be a massive highway that connects all three countries. Search NAFTA Superhighway.
Yeah, because there couldn’t possibly be a massive highway connecting countries without a conspiratorial plot to abolish the U.S. government and end the constitution.
And don’t forget the Nazi’s riding Dinosaurs, everyone always forgets that part!
While I don’t know about Nazi’s riding dinosaurs, and I certainly don’t always agree with Lou Dobbs, you may want to watch this CNN report:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14Li0Wa5rc0
Is Rep. Walter Jones a tinfoil hat wearer too?
Or, you might prefer this report:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtqAOUvUtZ4
@Pat Berry: if the US decided to merge with Canada and Mexico, we’d just have to say, “Welcome aboard 51st and 52nd state. Anyone got a problem with that?” There can’t be an invasion without resistance, and who in their right mind would resist? Besides, while our GDP per capita would decrease a few percent, the one in Mexico would like quadruple overnight. If it weren’t for the millions of starving poor people it would add to our entitlement programs, I’d say we should have annexed them two decades ago instead of Reagan’s amnesty program.
increased trade =/= a North American Union and when you get down to the meat of it, that’s what any real evidence for the theory amounts to.
When they quote people talking about communal borders, for the most part this is what they’re referring to, that you can trade goods easily between the three countries themselves and will only hit the heavier tariffs/regulations when you move beyond that.
Now whether you oppose that or not, it’s a leap from this sort of thing to the core of the North American Union argument–that there’s an unspoken-of conspiracy to end U.S. sovereignty, abolish the dollar, abolish the constitution, etc. Treaties for easier trade go back to the founding of the country.
For most of the U.S. history it was also actually much easier to travel back and forth across the borders than it is today. At the turn of the century, if you weren’t carrying any diseases and weren’t known to be wanted for any major crimes, then, that’s it, you were let in. It wasn’t until the 1920s that heavy restrictions were implemented.
Argue in favor of those things and argue against all those things all you, but it’s still gigantic leap to take it one step further and do what the conspiracy guys are doing here–saying that this indicates some covert plot to abolish the U.S.
On a side note (and I realize this is beside the point and you’ve said you don’t agree with him on everything) I’d just like to point out that Lou Dobbs spent the entire 90’s being the complete opposite of what he is now. The guy spent the entire decade kissing the *** of every big-time corporate CEO he could get on his show, he never made any pretense to any of this populist stuff, then when the market crumbled and a lot of people decided they lost money listening to guys like him, he went the other direction and sought a new audience. I don’t really have a point here, I just hate Lou Dobbs.
Do you remember the premise put forward to create the European Union? It was strictly a commerce deal that would strengthen Europe as a trade group, supposedly without affecting the cultures of sovereign countries…ummm.
Since every country has trade treaties with other countries and has for centuries, that’s just a bit too tenuous for me to draw the conclusion–that it’s a plan to abolish U.S.
Say it would, how many people in the military do you think would sit back and allow it to happen? In Europe, their militaries are welfare programs for officers and a few key countries are embarrassed by their own past anyway, so who cares? (and even there they’ve had their own problems doing it-if you can’t get the Dutch to along with it, you’re going to have a little more difficulty in the U.S.) Here, the ones opposed to abolishing the constitution would be the ones with all the guns, so even if someone was to try it-good luck — you take an oath to defend the constitution in the army not to support some NAU plot.
You know, honestly, I think another problem would be getting Mexico and Canada to go along with it. We have twice the population of Mexico and Canada combined, so there’s a decent chance they’d just see it as the U.S. swamping them. A lot of people try to immigrate here from both countries, but out of those who stay, a ton of Canadians define themselves as being anti-U.S. and there’s a decent amount of people in Mexico with a chip on their shoulder about U.S./Mexico relations. It’d be difficult to convince them something like the North American Union wouldn’t be a U.S. takeover whether it really was or not.
“To start with there will be a massive highway that connects all three countries.”
I hate to break it to you, Sarcasm Man, but there already is a highway connecting all three countries. It’s called the Pan-American Highway, and I learned about it in grade school back in the 1960s.
If two years ago someone had suggested in a post on this board that our government was moving forward with a bill that contained the provisions of the Amnesty/Immigration bill that just came incredibly close to being signed into law, I’m guessing there would be the same conspiracy accusations.
And, that mess progressed in full view of the media, and not in primarily closed meetings as this deal has.
Si, this is wonderful news, eh?!
In the summertime, I can import some 52nd state Mexicans to pick my lettuce, and in the wintertime, I can import some 51st state Cannucks to shovel my driveway.
God Bless America!