16 Comments

  1. “Now health-care advocates are taking a different tack, arguing that lead bullet fragments in game such as venison are neurotoxins that can harm children and developing fetuses.” Really!?! So since when do California Liberals give a rat’s behind about fetuses! Total effing BS.

  2. Barnes Bullets is the biggest “no-lead” bullet maker, although even Remington is getting into the act. The all copper or all copper alloy bullets work pretty well although like all (fairly) new things there is a learning curve involved. The biggest drawback is their cost and, of course, they are totally unsuitable for muzzle loaders or black powder cartridge rifles.

    The real problem is that leftists think total ignorance of firearms is a plus.

  3. It makes sense to ban lead ammunition for waterfowl hunting, since the pellets that miss the birds will fall into the water and be eaten by the ducks, geese, and perhaps some fish; that’s the explanation I remember when my state banned lead pellets–or required steel shot, I don’t recall which–for waterfowl hunting. But all hunting? Naw, pointless.

    Another aspect of lead contamination I have heard about was an indoor range that my Army Reserve unit that had to be de-leaded, not from the spent bullets, but from the lead in the primer.

    But, this law seems like those labels you see: “This product contains chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer.” Perhaps the San Andreas faults warps the physics–or the mercury in the rivers from the California gold rush is still warping their brains (or their thinking) so they experience a different reality from the rest of us.

  4. Use stainless steel flechette shotgun rounds. You might have to do a little sewing up of the lacerated pelt afterwards, but at least the kill will be lead-free and very “green”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.