We thought we smacked Obama on the nose enough that even though he obviously wants to take all our guns he won’t even dare mention gun control, but indications are that he’s soon going to try to use Tucson to pass some law. It will probably blow up in his face as do most of his proposals, but why can’t we get ahead of this? The gun control people don’t know much about guns, so maybe we should try to plant the seed of an idea of what laws to pass.
“You know what we could ban that criminals love but a common citizen would never need: High-capacity barrels – gun barrels that hold ten or more bullets at once.”
The important thing is that most of us 2nd Amendment supporters will have to act like it’s an outrage, yelling stuff like, “No! That’s destroying our freedom! Founding Fathers mad!”
And then when Obama passes it, he’ll rub his hands together greedily and say, “Ha! Now I takes your nasty freedoms! Hee hee hee!”
But we’ll secretly be laughing at him — as we usually are when we aren’t laughing openly.
Sustaining the American dream has never been about standing pat,”
“It has required each generation to sacrifice, and struggle, and meet
the demands of a new age. Now it’s our turn.” Resident Barrack Hussein Obama
Its all code words. It’s simple subliminal programming.
If you want to build an army of Killer Robots
you give them these commands.
REQUIRED SACRIFICE
STRUGGLE OUR TURN
Whatever we do, we can’t tell the gun control people about fully automatic Fetzer Valves, especially the ones that use ball bearings.
Lets not be leftists about this and pass all laws thoughtlessly, what if laser cannons store ammo in the barrel! So lets actually write the law to be 2k pages with lots of “and then the secretary of robot invasion will submit to the will of Frank J” listings. That way whatever happens now and in the future we can just bend the interpretation to suit our wishes. The left has taught me well.
Sorry I am up way past my bedtime.
You know how leftists are always hating on guns saying they are metal penises. Well that explains why feminists hate them so much. Also explains why Obamas law specifically states that all barrels longer then 3″ with circumference greater then 2/3″ shall be banned.
I cant prove if guns are metal Peni but womens purses are certainly leathery vag-inas.
We should repeal the second amendment entirely. Then OUR judges can have fun discovering things like the right to keep cannon on your front lawn, the right to shoot hippies, the right to have the federal government pay for your ammo etc.
When pressed they can claim that it is tied to that time Jefferson used the phrase “Musket To the Junk”
No, you cant let them restrict high cap barrels, that would destroy Metal Storm.
Hey. I live in the People Republic of Cali.
Ignorance and fear of firearms is rife. Multibarrel guns? I have a vintage WW2 German Nebelwerfer.
Is that covered?
I keep a handy jpg that shows the difference between clips and magazines.
I also remind my co-workers that most types of body armor are legal in Cali? Why? They are DEFENSIVE, baby.
Molon Labe, bee-yatches..
Has it really become such a novel concept to simply tell them to shut the hell up…?
I say they ban high-velocity clips and high-capacity clips.
Nobody needs a clip that travels at supersonic speeds or one that holds more than 8 rounds.
You know how I know? The clip for a Garand is 8 rounds.
Hopefully they won’t realize a clip is not a magazine until after they get voted out of office for being anti-gun weinies.
I think we need to ban guns with the special bullet thing that you put in the thing and then you do the thing with it and then you make the noise and then it’s really bad, man.
I have this thing called a BoreSnake, and, like, I think they should ban it, you know, because snakes are, like, really, really dangerous and bad people could use it to bore people and also to, um, like, do snake stuff, so I think the government should totally ban it since, like, few people are as trustworthy as me and the BoreSnake is very poisonous stuff and stuff, you know?
I also have this gun with Marlin written on it and Marlins are very big and scary and I think it could frighten children because Marlins have very big and sharp teeth, you know, so we should probably ban that too.
The system has failed me. Dont you hate when you write something funny about the size of Obamas wang and you get moderated. A good system would put it right to the top.
@Marko no what we should start posting all over the left-wing-whing-o-sphere.
“Oh no lefties please dont exploit this tragedy to ban barrel snakes!” No joke this would get passed by Obama and copied by 15 states before some jackhole told the lefties there is no such thing.
Besides shouldn’t lefties be more concerned with outlawing murder and homelessness and racism and financial independence and Christmas celebrations?
sorry no=know
In the spirit of civility that I have been ordered to have. I would like to say. Control in a meaningful way that looks to the future and isn’t mean spirited or taken out of context is debatable.
In plain English: I will gladly give you my gun; one bullet at a time.
In order for them to take our guns from most of us, they would have to print fbi guys like they do money.
Just so they don’t ban multi-barreled automatic pistols!!! That would like suck!
By the way, automatics like a Baretta are really cool for playing Russian Roulette with your idiot neighbor. Just make sure he’s first…
I also agree that High Speed Clips should be banned. I want my clip to remain stationary as the spring inside it feeds bullets (Hollow Points are best) to the magazine where they are discharged and harmlessly popped out the side! It’s kind of a pew, pew, pew thing!
You can have my gun when I’m out of ammo and it is left cooling in my cold dead fingers!
In the interest of bipartisanship, I think we ought to make some concessions to the liberals on the issue of 2nd amendment rights:
1.) Allow them to ban the use of ammunition that doesn’t fit in the gun.
2.) Allow them to ban the use of firearms that can only fire a flag that says “bang!’
3.) Allow them to ban the use of firearms that launch rocket-powered plaster fists, with the exception that these may still be used against hippies.
4.) Let them ban the use of Nerf guns, or any other guns that fire soft, harmless materials.
4.a) The applications of this restriction may include, but not be limited to, police officers who prefer to use guns that fire fast-moving beanbags. In order to let the liberals pursue their goal of not keeping America safe, police have much of their arsenal taken away, leaving them ONLY guns that fire real ammunition.
5.) In order to protect the liberals from the big bad gun-toting conservatives, ONLY registered Democrats may purchase, possess, or use firearms with backwards-pointing barrels. The purchase, possession, or use of such firearms by anybody else, especially conservatives, is strictly prohibited.
6.) In order to eliminate the “violent rhetoric” that [apparently] causes tragedies, all “violent rhetoric” is to be banned, and replaced by “violent actions.”
If we offer to go along with these restrictions, maybe they’ll let gun owners keep their other rights. Heh heh. “Letting” people with guns keep their rights.
Lolziter —
Here in Cali they already tried your #1. It was called AB962. Banning internet sales of handgun ammo.
Fortunatly, it was so poorly written no one (incl the sponsors) could define the entire category of hand gun ammo. It was struck down at the last minute but the dummies keep trying…
once that killer in Arizona is found NOT GUILTY because of insanity induced by Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin everything is going to change. Eventually they will take away your right to own a gun.
Its just a matter of time before ‘they’ Pin the Tail on the TeaBag (or on Rush L. or Ann C. or Sean H.) because that is what they want to do and the media will be happy to help them do it. And I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if they (the liberal-ists) don’t stage and film the next killings just so they can get a law passed. How do we know they didn’t stage the last one? They elected an illegal alien to the Presidency! A little law banning guns will be simple in comparison.
They should also ban rust; you know how it lines the inside of the barrel & helps the bullets gain traction as it speeds along.
All +3 ammunition or higher, banned. Vorpal ammunition, also.
Armor percing triggers should also be gone.
Full auto revolvers are pretty damgerous, too…
They could ban hair triggers and start making them out of titanium.
“It will probably blow up in his face”
Violent Rhetoric!!
How about a gun ban that actually makes sense?
I say we ban the ATF, and everyone in it, from possessing firearms.
@17 -“firearms that launch rocket-powered plaster fists,”
Where can I get one of these?
You can have My gun when I place it in Your cold, dead hand.
“Another liberal suicide, Detective Flanagan. Third one this week!”
(oops – too vitriolic?)
High-speed rail rail-guns
One shot is more than enough
“Obama going after guns?” …………………well, duh. Isn’t that what he promised to do before he was elected? After all we “clingers” and “birthers” need to be taken down or out depending on who’s ‘hood you’re in.
So, the surprise inside this box of Cracker Jacks would be exactly what?
All they have to do is to stage a few more deaths, or to quote thee Obama, “..has required each generation to sacrifice..” then the goals of Gun control will be easier to accomplish. Its all apart of the “struggle” to “meet the demands of a new age” that thee Obama speaks of in his well coded subliminal messages.
Required Sacrifice Demands Struggle New Age
The Age of Obama
Whenever someone uses the phrase “Gun Control” think about the meanings of the words Eleútheros and Seax.
Eleútheros is defined and one who is not a slave, a freeman. It is the English phonetic representation of Ελεύθερος, Greek for “Free.”
A Seax was a single edged knife from Old Saxon culture, carrying one meant you were a freeman and not a slave.
In essence, being armed meant you were Eleútheros or free.
The left would like to take the modern equivalent of a Seax away from you, so that you are no longer Eleútheros – essentially anti- Eleútheros.
Eleútheros is also the origin of the word līber, the root word for Liberal and Liberty.
So, disarming people – taking away their means of self defense – meant they were enslaved and the people who advocate this are anti – līber, anti- Liberty.
In the past, weapons have signified whether one is a freeman [Ελεύθερος, ‘free’] taking them away signifies that that they are now a slave – in this case, as slave to a socialist government. It also means that one who wishes to take these weapons away, and thus take away their Ελεύθερος or līber are in fact working counter to the idea of liberty.
Now, which political classification wants more Gun control?
What is the ideology that wants to disarm a free people.
What is the label of those that would take away the blessings of liberty?
So-called “Liberals” want to take away one of the very things that make a people free.
So-called ‘Liberals’ want to take away your Liberty.
Just something to think about when Leftists claim to be “Liberal”
I knew it!
The liberals are going to try and take sex away from me!
Metalstorm is a barrel with multiple rounds… but hey its not all the way here yet. Just saying
I’ve seen articles over the past few weeks about military lasers that will shoot down missiles and airplanes. Shouldn’t laser pointers be banned?