Alamo: If hesheit wins the Presidency, there’ll also be a permanent presidential commission on PMS for the “two Americas” – those that have it, and those that don’t.
Any man who has to try to prove he and his wife enjoy a satisfying physical relationship by revealing intimate details needs to pack it in, give it up and GO AWAY.
So Mr. Edwards have you stopped beating your wife yet?
Considering he was good enough to walk onto a D1 college football team, I’m pretty well sure he’d kick all of your pansy-asses. Once you guys get one of yourlittle memes going, I think you actually begin to believe it.
Amazing how all these weenie Breck Girl defenders find college football the leading indicator of “toughness”.
I’d take you up on your little proposition steve, but I have a personal rule against striking a woman. Then again I am convinced any of the ladies who post here would wipe the floor with Silky.
Edwards is a world class pussy by any definition, and I’m sure somewhere deep in your own effeminate subconcious you feel his pain. Emapthy is after all one of the finest attributes of the fairer sex.
I’d suggest you send John a card or even some flowers. It will mean a lot.
Alamo, you’re probably too much of a pussy to strap on some pads and get it on, so you’ve gotta talk that smack. Hope the chess club helped you pick up guys.
Anyway, get a gun and get your ass to Iraq or STFU with the tough guy BS.
love,
Steve [So no you can’t comment on Edwards unless you’re willing to go to Iraq? Is there nothing some people won’t stretch that stupid chickenhawk meme to? Also, I like it when the trolls use a smiley face at the end instead of saying “love,” but I guess trolls have to differ slightly so they’re not complete redundant. -Ed.]
Troll I may be….
After advancing the John Edwards is a fag meme, you have consrtucted quite a glass house.
But it’s not the chickenhawk fallacy. If our military had things well in hand in Iraq, or could have things well in hand with a simple shift in policy, then this would be the Chickenhawk fallacy. However, since…
1.Our folks in uniform are stretched to the breaking point and are deployed well past reasonable limits
2. Lack of overwhelming force may be the mission’s undoing
3. Necons claim that this is an EXISTENTIAL struggle
and last but not least
4. Neocons who are NOT fighting are calling other people who are NOT fighting pussies for calling for an end to the war
…it becomes appropriate to call neocons of fighting age a bunch of hypocritical pussies. If the above were not true, you’d be quite right, and it would be like saying you have to be a cop to call for an end to crime – a ludicrous contention.
As the above IS true, however, I say: get a gun and go East young men.
love,
Steve the Troll
I thought we covered the difference between the chickenhawk fallacy and what I wrote. Oh well…
You talk to military people? That’s quite brave of you. I wouldn’t get any closer than that – could be dangerous! We need you on the home front urging the country to stay the course! I agree with you that this is the struggle of our lives, and that we should question the manhood of those who question the war, because urging on (but not fighting) wars is manly while opposing (but not fighting) wars is girly. You might think that short of actually fighting, manliness or girliness wouldn’t really apply. But you know better, and that’s what I like about you.
When our country needs soldiers desperately to fight a war that you et al. say is really important, but you et al. won’t fight, and then you et al. start to talk about the manliness (or lack thereof) of taking certain POLITICAL stands, I’m well within my right to call you et al. snivelling pussies – and I can do it w/o invoking the chickenhawk fallacy. Because it IS a fallacy, and would be wrong.
On second thought, I just reread what I wrote and… wow, I am so retarded. I can’t believe I actually peed my pants while writing this.
What am I sitting in?
Hello steve;
My what an angry little fellow you are! How is the convention going? Is this thread fulfilling your requisite angry rant & obfuscation requirement? If not it should be. You little guys sure have trouble focusing on the point of a discussion (or parody for that matter).
To begin, I never made any statement equating Silky Pony’s lack of military experience with his apparent (woefully so) lack of masculinity. This man’s emasculation makes legitimate gay guys cringe, and it has nothing to do with his not serving. If it is not so apparent to you I would suggest the explanation lies in my previous post: You also have that same feminine hyper-empathy, and it makes you feel tingly when Lil’ John tells you how your failure is not your fault and its all because of those big bad capitalists. Don’t be ashamed of it, you were born that way.
And just to bestill your rapidly beating little heart, you are correct I am not serving and have not. My father was career wtih three tours in SEA, and my younger brother is active duty (a career guy) with two tours in the sandbox. I work with military guys, most of my childhood friends are active duty. To a man (and two women)they believe Edwards is a bigger pussy than I do. Curiously (to you and the other Kos Kids), their lack of regard for Silky has nothing to do with his service or lack thereof; never even enters the conversation.
I did play football (in case you believe that makes me a tough guy!), and have had shots fired at me in anger. But regardless of what activity makes you think qualifies one to comment or makes someone a “ruffian”, I will tell you that I have never met a knee quivering little libtard I wouldn’t throw down with. Actually I have found their “slap fight” tactics disconcerting, but not terribly effective. The crying jags and sobbing always get to me however, and when they finally ask for a hug, it is just impossible to keep pummeling them.
OK.
Why aren’t you tough guys in Iraq again? I missed that in the explanation. Let’s approacht he problem mathematically!
(me no have penis)+(angry at the toaster)= i can has cheezburger?
Well, that proof didn’t work!
love,
Steve the Troll
Well steve, you’ve just crossed the line from simply confused to idiot.
Your original diatribe against my post implies that my characterization of John Edwards as the biggest wuss to ever run for the Presidency has something to do with his support then subsequent non-support for the war in Iraq. You continue this Kos tactic, although I never made this association- you complete moron. John Edwards is an emasculated little blood sucking, ambulance chasing, hair obsessed, squat to pee, pussy regardless of his stance on the war. The evidence is clear and overwhelming.
Your “concern” for the war effort is transparently fraudulent and touchingly obtuse. Kos like liberal weenies are far from the best sources to rely upon when commenting on military resources and deployment.
Pertinent exit question: If John Edwards (and his supporters) concern for “the troops” and their mission in Iraq or Afghanistan is genuine, why do they, by an embarrassing majority, regard him as a complete fool and a pussy besides?
Part two: Would you as an Edwards supporter count on say more than 20% of the active duty military to vote for him in a general election?
If so, I hope you’re on Silky’s campaign staff. You truly seem to have what it takes.
BTW – I think it’s great that the moderator here changes people’s posts. That’s rich. What a beautiful admission it is…
I’m NOT an Edwards supporter, and I am NOT a Dem. I AM the Queen of the fairies.
blah bla blah blah blah neocons blah blah (repeat for three pages)
love
Steve
I didn’t think anyone would ernestly answer my post. Just contemplating it would result in a serious case of vaginitis and an expensive trip to the gynecologist.
Remember: don’t itch! And eat lots of yogurt, for some reason
love,
Steve the Troll, ESQ.
Alamo,
Please, DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS. If you do they keep coming back for more.
New mantra. “If I just ignore him, he’ll go away”
Eventually he’ll get tired of talking to himself.
I know it’s counter-intuative but I’ve found this to be the best thing for my sanity.
“A chicken with a $400 haircut in every pot!”
They don’t call him “Silky Pony” for nothin’ !! It’s ’cause of all that lovely socialist peach fuzz on his cheeks. Oops, double meaning. OK.
If he wins the Presidency, Bethesda will issue an annual “gynecogical addendum” to the President’s health report.
Alamo: If hesheit wins the Presidency, there’ll also be a permanent presidential commission on PMS for the “two Americas” – those that have it, and those that don’t.
He’ll tussle his hair as he sqeals. Then he’ll start crying because he messed up his hair.
The ninny.
SQUEALS
Dammit.
I think adding “girlish” was a little superfluous.
Any man who has to try to prove he and his wife enjoy a satisfying physical relationship by revealing intimate details needs to pack it in, give it up and GO AWAY.
So Mr. Edwards have you stopped beating your wife yet?
Considering he was good enough to walk onto a D1 college football team, I’m pretty well sure he’d kick all of your pansy-asses. Once you guys get one of yourlittle memes going, I think you actually begin to believe it.
Amazing how all these weenie Breck Girl defenders find college football the leading indicator of “toughness”.
I’d take you up on your little proposition steve, but I have a personal rule against striking a woman. Then again I am convinced any of the ladies who post here would wipe the floor with Silky.
Edwards is a world class pussy by any definition, and I’m sure somewhere deep in your own effeminate subconcious you feel his pain. Emapthy is after all one of the finest attributes of the fairer sex.
I’d suggest you send John a card or even some flowers. It will mean a lot.
Alamo, you’re probably too much of a pussy to strap on some pads and get it on, so you’ve gotta talk that smack. Hope the chess club helped you pick up guys.
Anyway, get a gun and get your ass to Iraq or STFU with the tough guy BS.
love,
Steve
[So no you can’t comment on Edwards unless you’re willing to go to Iraq? Is there nothing some people won’t stretch that stupid chickenhawk meme to? Also, I like it when the trolls use a smiley face at the end instead of saying “love,” but I guess trolls have to differ slightly so they’re not complete redundant. -Ed.]
Troll I may be….
After advancing the John Edwards is a fag meme, you have consrtucted quite a glass house.
But it’s not the chickenhawk fallacy. If our military had things well in hand in Iraq, or could have things well in hand with a simple shift in policy, then this would be the Chickenhawk fallacy. However, since…
1.Our folks in uniform are stretched to the breaking point and are deployed well past reasonable limits
2. Lack of overwhelming force may be the mission’s undoing
3. Necons claim that this is an EXISTENTIAL struggle
and last but not least
4. Neocons who are NOT fighting are calling other people who are NOT fighting pussies for calling for an end to the war
…it becomes appropriate to call neocons of fighting age a bunch of hypocritical pussies. If the above were not true, you’d be quite right, and it would be like saying you have to be a cop to call for an end to crime – a ludicrous contention.
As the above IS true, however, I say: get a gun and go East young men.
love,
Steve the Troll
I thought we covered the difference between the chickenhawk fallacy and what I wrote. Oh well…
You talk to military people? That’s quite brave of you. I wouldn’t get any closer than that – could be dangerous! We need you on the home front urging the country to stay the course! I agree with you that this is the struggle of our lives, and that we should question the manhood of those who question the war, because urging on (but not fighting) wars is manly while opposing (but not fighting) wars is girly. You might think that short of actually fighting, manliness or girliness wouldn’t really apply. But you know better, and that’s what I like about you.
When our country needs soldiers desperately to fight a war that you et al. say is really important, but you et al. won’t fight, and then you et al. start to talk about the manliness (or lack thereof) of taking certain POLITICAL stands, I’m well within my right to call you et al. snivelling pussies – and I can do it w/o invoking the chickenhawk fallacy. Because it IS a fallacy, and would be wrong.
On second thought, I just reread what I wrote and… wow, I am so retarded. I can’t believe I actually peed my pants while writing this.
What am I sitting in?
Hello steve;
My what an angry little fellow you are! How is the convention going? Is this thread fulfilling your requisite angry rant & obfuscation requirement? If not it should be. You little guys sure have trouble focusing on the point of a discussion (or parody for that matter).
To begin, I never made any statement equating Silky Pony’s lack of military experience with his apparent (woefully so) lack of masculinity. This man’s emasculation makes legitimate gay guys cringe, and it has nothing to do with his not serving. If it is not so apparent to you I would suggest the explanation lies in my previous post: You also have that same feminine hyper-empathy, and it makes you feel tingly when Lil’ John tells you how your failure is not your fault and its all because of those big bad capitalists. Don’t be ashamed of it, you were born that way.
And just to bestill your rapidly beating little heart, you are correct I am not serving and have not. My father was career wtih three tours in SEA, and my younger brother is active duty (a career guy) with two tours in the sandbox. I work with military guys, most of my childhood friends are active duty. To a man (and two women)they believe Edwards is a bigger pussy than I do. Curiously (to you and the other Kos Kids), their lack of regard for Silky has nothing to do with his service or lack thereof; never even enters the conversation.
I did play football (in case you believe that makes me a tough guy!), and have had shots fired at me in anger. But regardless of what activity makes you think qualifies one to comment or makes someone a “ruffian”, I will tell you that I have never met a knee quivering little libtard I wouldn’t throw down with. Actually I have found their “slap fight” tactics disconcerting, but not terribly effective. The crying jags and sobbing always get to me however, and when they finally ask for a hug, it is just impossible to keep pummeling them.
OK.
Why aren’t you tough guys in Iraq again? I missed that in the explanation. Let’s approacht he problem mathematically!
(me no have penis)+(angry at the toaster)= i can has cheezburger?
Well, that proof didn’t work!
love,
Steve the Troll
Well steve, you’ve just crossed the line from simply confused to idiot.
Your original diatribe against my post implies that my characterization of John Edwards as the biggest wuss to ever run for the Presidency has something to do with his support then subsequent non-support for the war in Iraq. You continue this Kos tactic, although I never made this association- you complete moron. John Edwards is an emasculated little blood sucking, ambulance chasing, hair obsessed, squat to pee, pussy regardless of his stance on the war. The evidence is clear and overwhelming.
Your “concern” for the war effort is transparently fraudulent and touchingly obtuse. Kos like liberal weenies are far from the best sources to rely upon when commenting on military resources and deployment.
Pertinent exit question: If John Edwards (and his supporters) concern for “the troops” and their mission in Iraq or Afghanistan is genuine, why do they, by an embarrassing majority, regard him as a complete fool and a pussy besides?
Part two: Would you as an Edwards supporter count on say more than 20% of the active duty military to vote for him in a general election?
If so, I hope you’re on Silky’s campaign staff. You truly seem to have what it takes.
BTW – I think it’s great that the moderator here changes people’s posts. That’s rich. What a beautiful admission it is…
I’m NOT an Edwards supporter, and I am NOT a Dem. I AM the Queen of the fairies.
blah bla blah blah blah neocons blah blah (repeat for three pages)
love
Steve
I didn’t think anyone would ernestly answer my post. Just contemplating it would result in a serious case of vaginitis and an expensive trip to the gynecologist.
Remember: don’t itch! And eat lots of yogurt, for some reason
love,
Steve the Troll, ESQ.
Alamo,
Please, DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS. If you do they keep coming back for more.
New mantra. “If I just ignore him, he’ll go away”
Eventually he’ll get tired of talking to himself.
I know it’s counter-intuative but I’ve found this to be the best thing for my sanity.