Matter cannot be destroyed (unless it pisses off Fred Thompson).
8 Comments
You see? Thompson is so powerful that he can destroy things protected by the laws of physics. Let’s see the Geniva Convention protect you NOW, terrorists!
Fred Thompson arises at 5 AM every day and his daily regimen starts with 1,000 push-ups…but with a Fred Thompson twist. Instead of the traditional push-up, Fred Thompson gets to the ‘down’ position then glares at the ground. Naturally (and wisely!) the earth moves out of his way.
Hey everyone, if I can talk serious for a sec? I’d really like y’alls opinion on something.
The below blog is NOT mine in any way shape or form; I saw it linked at Rush this morning: http://forget-fred.blogspot.com/. He does make some convincing arguments against Fred!, at least enough that I’m back in my “Anyone But Hillary” voter indecision.
Putting aside likability or Fred-invincibility for a sec, who would be the most electable combo likely to beat Her?
Giuliani and Huckabee?
Thompson and Huckabee?
Thompson and Romney?
What will it take NOT to let HER into the WH? I’m seriously afraid of an HRC presidency, folks, and rightly so since the values voters have already pledged to stay home if they aren’t represented on the ticket, which will thus elect HRT by default…
Sorry for interrupting everyone, this just has me really worried.
Matter cannot be destroyed (unless it pisses off Fred Thompson
well even after that it still existes it just chagned into a different state of being.
Pain, pure pain
When trying to explain the a portion of the destruction of matter to Fred Thompson, a dweep once said “This extension may actually be defined for any theory endowing the space-time with a (pseudo-) Riemannian metric g with (+ – — ) signature and in which SR holds true at the local scale [12]. Then, in any possible reference frame F (defined by a spatial network of observers equipped with measuring rods and clocks), we have a spatial metric g = gF (it depends on the frame) and, at any point x bound to F, a local time tx [13-14]. The latter may be synchronized [13-14] along any line”
to which he had his head ripped off and shoved up his ass…
When trying to explain the a portion of the destruction of matter to Fred Thompson, a dweep once said “This extension may actually be defined for any theory endowing the space-time with a (pseudo-) Riemannian metric g with (+ – — ) signature and in which SR holds true at the local scale [12]. Then, in any possible reference frame F (defined by a spatial network of observers equipped with measuring rods and clocks), we have a spatial metric g = gF (it depends on the frame) and, at any point x bound to F, a local time tx [13-14]. The latter may be synchronized [13-14] along any line”
to which he had his head ripped off and shoved up his ass…
You see? Thompson is so powerful that he can destroy things protected by the laws of physics. Let’s see the Geniva Convention protect you NOW, terrorists!
Fred Thompson arises at 5 AM every day and his daily regimen starts with 1,000 push-ups…but with a Fred Thompson twist. Instead of the traditional push-up, Fred Thompson gets to the ‘down’ position then glares at the ground. Naturally (and wisely!) the earth moves out of his way.
Hey everyone, if I can talk serious for a sec? I’d really like y’alls opinion on something.
The below blog is NOT mine in any way shape or form; I saw it linked at Rush this morning: http://forget-fred.blogspot.com/. He does make some convincing arguments against Fred!, at least enough that I’m back in my “Anyone But Hillary” voter indecision.
Putting aside likability or Fred-invincibility for a sec, who would be the most electable combo likely to beat Her?
Giuliani and Huckabee?
Thompson and Huckabee?
Thompson and Romney?
What will it take NOT to let HER into the WH? I’m seriously afraid of an HRC presidency, folks, and rightly so since the values voters have already pledged to stay home if they aren’t represented on the ticket, which will thus elect HRT by default…
Sorry for interrupting everyone, this just has me really worried.
Matter cannot be destroyed (unless it pisses off Fred Thompson
well even after that it still existes it just chagned into a different state of being.
Pain, pure pain
When trying to explain the a portion of the destruction of matter to Fred Thompson, a dweep once said “This extension may actually be defined for any theory endowing the space-time with a (pseudo-) Riemannian metric g with (+ – — ) signature and in which SR holds true at the local scale [12]. Then, in any possible reference frame F (defined by a spatial network of observers equipped with measuring rods and clocks), we have a spatial metric g = gF (it depends on the frame) and, at any point x bound to F, a local time tx [13-14]. The latter may be synchronized [13-14] along any line”
to which he had his head ripped off and shoved up his ass…
When trying to explain the a portion of the destruction of matter to Fred Thompson, a dweep once said “This extension may actually be defined for any theory endowing the space-time with a (pseudo-) Riemannian metric g with (+ – — ) signature and in which SR holds true at the local scale [12]. Then, in any possible reference frame F (defined by a spatial network of observers equipped with measuring rods and clocks), we have a spatial metric g = gF (it depends on the frame) and, at any point x bound to F, a local time tx [13-14]. The latter may be synchronized [13-14] along any line”
to which he had his head ripped off and shoved up his ass…
LOLOLOLOL!
E=mc2…..OR FRED THOMPSON