Who’s the Bigger Tool: The Tool, Or The Tools Who Follow Him?

I didn’t realize Keith Olbermann, a tedious, pandering O’Reilly wannabe (who would want to be like O’Reilly?), has a small, crazy, Ron Paul like following according to the abuse I got in the comments to my latest video (one called me a “dum stoopid heebilly neocon jue”). I don’t know how they all found it; I guess they go around looking for anything about their savior like the Ronulans. The way they acted, you think I insulted the prophet Mohammad. This has to be the most pathetic example of idol worship I have ever seen; it makes me weep for humanity. As Olbermann would say, “Eeawh!”

No Comments

  1. When I mock Olbermann I always get the line (usually filled with typos and obscenities), “he’s better than O’Reilly!” Uh, as is 91 percent of humanity; what else you got?
    Liberals seem to think conservatives adore BOR. I know about 3,428 conservatives and the only person I know who watches him is my 94-year-old Democrat grandma. (Yeah, she’s kind of immature for her age…)

  2. Results from the Iowa “poll”;
    If Romney’s was the most visible campaign, Rep. Ron Paul’s was the loudest. A Paul parade snaked through the grounds at noon, chanting the Texas congressman’s name. In front of one RV, emblazoned with the slogan “Say Yes to Dr. No,” a Paul supporter was feeding a monkey in a diaper. Another sported a T-shirt reading “Ron Paul: Not the Lesser of Two Evils.”
    MONKEY ATTACKS! The ronulans are planning MONKEY ATTACKS!

  3. I hate to argue semantics but doesn’t being a tool imply that you’ve offered yourself up for some sort of use? Sitting in front of the TV making poopie noises along with Keith isn’t exactly working for the man. His fans seem more to be some variety of desiccated vegetable matter. More specifically the sort of miserable git that regularly converse politics with his television set. I mean, it’s healthy to curse at the damn thing fairly regularly. Why else would someone own a TV? But these people expect an intelligible response. Bladderman isn’t.

  4. “Unfortunately for Olbermann, your video has now been watched by more people than his show.”
    Buy the way Frank, you might want to up your liability coverage against brain damage incurred by your readers. Although many of us might have a problem proving it was actually your blog that caused the damage. That qualifies that clip as evidence should anyone ever make a claim.

  5. There must be Olbermanns, that way we can tell bad from good, right from wrong or left some might say, and weak from strong. All things have an opposite.
    Olbermann’s opposite is Ron Paul, not important enough to be a threat, just lame enough to be an irritant.

  6. I have proof that Ron Paul is married to Ru Paul. What is it, you ask? They both have the same monogram and I am completing my enhancements of their wedding photographs.
    My proof rises to AT LEAST the level of proof used by the Goreacle…

  7. I thought it was another lame attempt at liberal wit using a pseudonym; “Wingnuts are a joke”. Zing!
    Obviously, the attempt failed like Democratic domestic policy. Or maybe he just really dislikes user friendly hardware.
    Personally, I always thought BeerNuts were kind of a joke, but to each their own.

  8. Alan, I also thought of saying that I’ve always liked wingnuts – on liberal bolts with lock washers applied. Cinch ’em down real tight so they don’t come off. On the otherhand, “bolting” liberals aren’t necessarily bad if they bolt to the Right side.
    Yeah, we could start a very long blog on the 75 year inheritance of a failed Democratic domestic policy, couldn’t we? Peeeple are so confused by it that it reduces them to name calling.
    Gotta run out now for some BeerNuts (and beer). Thanks for reminding me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.